Tuesday, January 29, 2008

None Dare Call it Conspiracy

Interesting book.. I've read about half of this.. Excellent for those who are just getting into this information.

None Dare Call it Conspiracy

Here's an excerpt:

With the leaders of the academic and communications world assuming this sneering
attitude towards the conspiratorial (or cause and effect) theory of history, it is not surprising that millions of innocent and well-meaning people, in a natural desire not to appear naive, assume the attitudes and repeat the cliches of the opinion makers. These persons, in their attempt to appear sophisticated, assume their mentors' air of smug superiority even though they themselves have not spent five minutes in study on the subject of international conspiracy.

The "accidentalists" would have us believe that ascribing any of our problems to planning is "simplistic" and all our problems are caused by Poverty, Ignorance and Disease — hereinafter abbreviated as PID. They ignore the fact that organized conspirators use PID, real and imagined, as an excuse to build a jail for us all. Most of the world has been in PID since time immemorial and it takes incredibly superficial thinking to ascribe the ricocheting of the United States government from one disaster to another over the past thirty years to PID. "Accidentalists" ignore the fact that some of the more advanced nations in the world have been captured by Communists. Czechoslovakia was one of the World's most modern industrial nations and Cuba had the second — highest per capita income of any nation in Central and South America.

It is not true, however, to state that there are no members of the intellectual elite who subscribe to the conspiratorial theory of history. For example, there is Professor Carroll Quigley of the Foreign Service School at Georgetown University. Professor Quigley can hardly be accused of being a "right wing extremist." (Those three words have been made inseparable by the mass media.) Dr. Quigley has all the "liberal" credentials, having taught at the Liberal Establishment's academic Meccas of Princeton and Harvard. In his 1300- page, 8 pound tome Tragedy and Hope, Dr. Quigley reveals the existence of the conspiratorial network which will be discussed in this book. The Professor is not merely formulating a theory, but revealing this network's existence from firsthand experience. He also makes it clear that it is only the network's secrecy and not their goals to which he objects.

Professor Quigley discloses:

"I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I HAVE NO AVERSION TO IT OR TO MOST OF ITS AIMS AND HAVE, FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, I BEEN CLOSE TO IT AND TO MANY OF ITS INSTRUMENTS. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that IT WISHES TO REMAIN UNKNOWN, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."



We agree, its role in history does deserve to be known. That is why we have written this book. However, we most emphatically disagree with this network's aim which the
Professor describes as "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole." In other words, this power mad clique wants to control and rule the world. Even more frightening, they want total control over all individual actions. As Professor Quigley observes:

"… his [the individual's] freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will be numbered from birth and followed, as a number, through his educational training, his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health and medical requirements, and his final retirement and death benefits."


It wants control over all natural resources, business, banking and transportation by controlling the governments of the world. In order to accomplish these aims the conspirators have had no qualms about fomenting wars, depressions and hatred. They want a monopoly which would eliminate all competitors and destroy the free' enterprise system.

And Professor' Quigley, of Harvard, Princeton and Georgetown approves!

Professor Quigley is not the only academic who is aware of the existence of a clique of self-perpetuating conspirators whom we shall call Insiders. Other honest scholars finding the same individuals at the scenes of disastrous political fires over and over again have concluded that there 'is obviously an organization of pyromaniacs at work in the world. But these intellectually honest scholars realize that if they challenged the Insiders headon, their careers would be destroyed. The author knows these men exist because he has been in contact with some of them.

There are also religious leaders who are aware of the existence of this conspiracy. In a UPI story dated December 27, 1965, Father Pedro Arrupe, head of the Jesuit Order of the Roman Catholic church, made the following charges during his remarks to the Ecumenical Council:

"This … Godless society operates in an extremely efficient manner at least in its higher levels of leadership. It makes use of every possible means at its disposal, be they scientific, technical, social or economic.

It follows a perfectly mapped-out strategy. It holds almost complete sway in international organizations, in financial circles, in the field of mass communications; press, cinema, radio and television."


There are a number of problems to be overcome in convincing a person of the possible
existence of a conspiratorial clique of Insiders who from the very highest levels
manipulate government policy. In this case truth is really stranger than fiction. We are dealing with history's greatest "whodunit," a mystery thriller which puts Erle Stanley Gardner to shame. If you love a mystery, you'll be fascinated with the study of the operations of the insiders. If you do study this network of which Professor Quigley speaks, you will find that what had at first seemed incredible not only exists, but heavily influences our lives.

It must be remembered that the first job of any conspiracy, whether it be in politics, crime or within a business office, is to convince everyone else that no conspiracy exists. The conspirators success will be determined largely by their ability to do this. That the elite of the academic world and mass communications media always pooh-pooh the existence of the Insiders merely serves to camouflage their operations. These "artists" hide the boy, the cart and the donkey.

Probably at some time you have been involved with or had personal knowledge of some
event which was reported in the news. Perhaps it concerned an athletic event, an election, a committee or your business. Did the report contain the "real" story, the story behind the story? Probably not. And for a variety of reasons. The reporter had time and space problems and there is a good chance the persons involved deliberately did not reveal all the facts. Possibly the reporter's own prejudices governed what facts went into the story and which were deleted. Our point is that most people know from personal experience that a news story often is not the whole story. But many of us assume that our own case is unique when really it is typical. What is true about the reporting of local events is equally as true about the reporting of national and international events.

Psychological problems are also involved in inducing people to look at the evidence
concerning the Insiders. People are usually comfortable with their old beliefs and
conceptions. When Columbus told people the world was a ball and not a pancake, they
were highly upset. They were being asked to reject their way of thinking of a lifetime and adopt a whole new outlook. The "intellectuals" of the day scoffed at Columbus and people were afraid they would lose social prestige if they listened to him. Many others just did not want to believe the world was round. It complicated too many things. And typical flat-earthers had such a vested interest involving their own egos, that they heaped abuse on Columbus for challenging their view of the universe. Don't confuse us with facts; our minds are made up," they said.

These same factors apply today. Because the Establishment controls the media, anyone
exposing the Insiders will be the recipient of a continuous fusillade of invective from newspapers, magazines, TV and radio. In this manner one is threatened with loss of "social respectability" if he dares broach the idea that there is organization behind any of the problems currently wracking America. Unfortunately, for many people social status comes before intellectual honesty. Although they would never admit it social position is more important to many people than is the survival of freedom in America.

If you ask these people which is more important — social respectability or saving their children from slavery — they will tell you the latter, of course. But their actions (or lack of same) speak so much louder than their words. PeopIe have an infinite capacity for rationalization when it comes to refusing to face the threat to America's survival. Deep down these people are afraid they may be laughed at if they take a stand, or may be denied an invitation to some social climber's cocktail party. Instead of getting mad at the insiders, these people actually get angry at these who are trying to save the country by exposing the conspirators.

One thing which makes it so hard for some socially minded people to assess the
conspiratorial evidence objectively is that the conspirators come from the very highest social strata. They are immensely wealthy, highly educated and extremely cultured. Many of them have lifelong reputations for philanthropy. Nobody enjoys being put in the position of accusing prominent people of conspiring to enslave their fellow Americans, but the facts are inescapable. Many business and professional people are particularly vulnerable to the "don't jeopardize your social respectability" pitch given by those who don't want the conspiracy exposed. The Insiders know that if the business and professional community will not take a stand to save the private enterprise system, the socialism through which they intend to control the world will be inevitable. They believe that most business and professional men are too shallow and decadent, too status conscious, too tied up in the problems of their jobs and businesses to worry about what is going on in politics. These men are told that it might be bad for business or jeopardize their government contracts if they take a stand. They have been bribed into silence with
their own tax monies!

We are hoping that the conspirators have underestimated the courage and patriotism remaining in the American people. We feel there are a sufficient number of you who are not mesmerized by the television set, who put God, family and country above social status, who will band together to expose and destroy the conspiracy of the insiders. The philosopher Diogenes scoured the length and breadth of ancient Greece searching for an honest man. We are scouring the length and breadth of America in search of hundreds of thousands of intellectually honest men and women who are willing to investigate facts and come to logical conclusions-no matter how unpleasant those conclusions may be.

The Signs of God - Friday Flames - Part III

Continuing with his discourse on verse (2:130) of Surah Al Baqarah today Huzur elucidated the fourth aspect of the Abrahamic prayer or the fourth excellence of the great Prophet, which, according to Hadhrat Ibrahim (on whom be peace) was required in the Seal of all Prophets to last till the Day of Judgement and which the Qur’an declares to have been fulfilled in (62:3).

Each Prophet of God brings teaching which seeks to attain the pleasure of God and purify his followers. The unique purification that these verses refer to is by virtue of the decisive verses of the Holy Qur’an, the like of which had not been revealed before. The teaching of the Qur’an is full of wisdom and each commandment has been mentioned with the reasoning behind it. Each word is a Sign facilitating unparalleled purification. This Book will now continue to purify till the Day of Judgement, its teaching has not omitted any aspect therefore it could not have excluded purification. The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) is the purifier of every person to be born till the Day of Judgement.

Explaining the Arabic word ‘tazkia’ (purification) Huzur said it connotes something enhanced, augmented; something that grows/develops as well as to make pure. The significance of ‘growth’ is of two kinds; one is to grow/develop in one’s self and the other is to grow in numbers and in apparatus/logistics. The purification is also of two kinds; that which is obvious and that which is ‘internal’. Hadhrat Musleh Maud (may Allah be pleased with him) said that this great Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) that the verse (2:130) speaks of, would not only purify the minds, rather by imparting wisdom, he would also purify hearts and these hearts would be filled with love of God and would reflect Godliness and onlookers would recognise these people to be people of God.

Huzur said this should be our aim and our objective and we should continue our endeavour towards attaining this, only then will be able to derive beneficence from the teaching of the Muzakki (purifier). Huzur explained that the Companions of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) had imbibed his ways. Considering their previous existence, this was a great Sign from God and indeed a miracle. Huzur then read an extract from the writing of the Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) which expounded the meteoric changes that manifested in the Companions after they believed in the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him); changes which transformed their earlier existence of barbarity and savagery into devoutness. This revolutionary change came about because they sought beneficence from the holiness of the ‘purifier’. The very same faculties that previously did not distinguish sin and wickedness strove to do good. Not only did they purify their hearts from the blessed company of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) rather they spread the good message and identified their Lord through the resplendent Signs.

As explained before, one meaning of the word ‘tazkia’ is to grow in numbers, therefore, Huzur said people will continue to believe in the message of Islam and a time will come when this faith will be triumphant over all other faiths. The earlier changes did not come about overnight, however, in accordance with the Abrahamic prayer those errant for generations were reformed in a spectacular way. Today we witness that there is Divine promise for the accomplishment of the mission of the Promised Messiah (on whom be peace). Temporary impediments should not generate despair. History bears witness that as long as his followers adhered to the teachings of the ‘purifier’ they won over hearts.

We have witnessed this in the time of the Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) as well. In order to purify ourselves we need to put the teachings of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) in practice. Once we have done this no force on earth can stop our triumph. Did all the restrictions put on us in Pakistan impede our progress? On the contrary, our progress accelerated as never before. Huzur addressed Ahmadis wherever in the world they face problems and said that they should not be unduly concerned. In Indonesia due to the mullah’s pressure the government is being harsh and is forcing things on us which have nothing to do with us even remotely. Huzur said to the Indonesian Jama’at that if their government exhibits cowardice and puts restrictions on them, let it do so. This will only end in a manifestation of pure people for the world to behold. The history of the Community bears witness that each and every impediment placed in its way has worked as an impetus for a higher flight. Indeed we declare that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is the Messiah and the Mahdi about whom the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) had prophesised. By coming into the subordination of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) Allah gave him the status of a non-law bearing prophet. This Community shall grow, indeed it is growing and no force on earth can stop this because this is the Community of the true and ardent devotee of the ‘purifier’. The more we will purify ourselves, the greater will be the help and succour of the Holy Spirit. (58:23)

Further expounding the subject Huzur said it is the believer’s task to reflect over the Holy Qur’an and the advice and counsel of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him).

The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) said ‘Avoid oppression because oppression will manifest itself as darkness on the Day of Judgement. Avoid greed, avarice, and malice as it destroyed the earlier people.’

The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) defined ‘a destitute person’ as that individual among his ummah who will present himself on the Day of Judgement with his Salat and his fasting. However, he would have had abused people and usurped other’s property and physically harmed others. His virtues (Salat & fasting) will be granted to his victims and he will thus be ‘destitute’.

Huzur said there are individuals who observe worship of God and who give a lot in financial terms, however, they usurp other’s rights. Huzur said purity is not by virtue of what is apparent, rather it is by virtue of the state of one’s heart. Financial giving is a source of purification for those who are well-off.


Citing verses (9:103) and (9:60) of Surah Taubah Huzur said it is not simply enjoined to give alms in the Qur’an, rather it is also elucidated where it could be used. The first mention is that of the poor who are completely helpless. Next it is the needy who cannot make a start because of lack of money, then the governmental workers and then ‘those whose hearts are to be reconciled’. Huzur said at the time of early Islam this category (those whose hearts are to be reconciled) was applicable on those who wished to accept Islam but due to various predicaments could not do so or the new Muslims who faced trouble for accepting Islam. However, this does not mean that Islam pays people to come into its fold. Huzur said in this day and age providing for resources for Tabligh could come under this category. The next mention in the verse for usage of alms is for the freeing of slaves. Huzur said although this is not applicable in the current age but unfortunately in some countries, like Pakistan, people give loans to servants and put them in a kind of slavery/bondage. It is just now that voices have been raised against this practice. The government should find a mutually agreeable solution for this and should not deprive either the employees or the employers of their rights.

Huzur explained the funds can also be used to help those who have suffered losses in business as well as spent on any good cause. They are also used to help travellers who cannot carry on with their travels due to lack of funds or to help students with their studies. Huzur said if Islamic governments implemented these teachings with good intentions, an image of Islam would emerge in the world that would be unmatched by any system of the world and all objections against Islam would dispel.

Huzur said the Community, within its limited resources, tries to adhere to the Islamic monetary system. However, the Islamic governments can implement this in a much better way. Even in Pakistan there are enough resources that could eradicate poverty. Huzur said this monetary system does not just give advantage to Muslims, in fact non-Muslims also benefit from this system.

Further explaining the concept of purity Huzur cited (2:223) and said that Allah also likes apparent cleanliness. Indeed, in the teaching of Islam there are specific instructions about oral hygiene, about keeping oneself clean, one’s environment clean. For worship there is the requisite of ablution. There is the specific bath on Friday, use of scent and not to go to the mosque having eaten something with strong odour. Huzur said the standard of cleanliness among Muslims is not up to mark considering how much they are enjoined towards it.

In terms of cleanliness of the environment Huzur said we seem to have the misconception that poverty and filth go hand in hand whereas the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) had enjoined that cleanliness is part of faith. Huzur related a couple of Ahadith to elucidate the matter. He said during his morning walk he notices some children looking rather unkempt just before school time. Huzur said parents should pay attention towards this matter and in places where [due to heat] one tends to perspire more, even though there can be water shortage, effort should be made to take at least one bath a day.


Huzur said cleansing of one’s heart was central. He elaborated on three vices which impede in one’s purification. One is jealousy. Huzur said this creates numerous problems. Indeed when we pray for refuge from the evil of the envier as in Surah Al Falaq (113:4) we should make an endeavour to avoid envying others as well. The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) said ‘Avoid jealousy, it burns up virtues in the manner fire burns up grass.’ Huzur said if each person honoured their dues towards others there would be no jealousy or envy. If the time that people spend consumed in jealousy was instead spent constructively, they would surpass others.

The other vice is lying. Huzur said it is essential to avoid all kind of falsehood and untruth. Indeed untruth takes one closer to shirk. The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) enjoined to adopt truth for he said truth leads to virtues and virtues take one to Paradise, whereas untruth should be avoided for it is a source of depravity and it takes one to the Fire. Huzur prayed that may Allah keep us all away from the curse of this practice.


The third vice that is creating a lot of problems is habitual borrowing and not returning of loans. Huzur said people make outlandish excuses at the time of return of loans and make all sorts of unfair accusations on the person who asks for his money to be returned. Huzur said this is not the practice of the pure hearted; indeed we have to adopt the ways shown to us by the ‘purifier’. Huzur said if one’s situation is such that repayment is not possible then an extension should be requested in a courteous manner or some surety may be given.

In conclusion Huzur prayed that may Allah enable us to put the teaching of the great Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) in practice and be included among those about whom Allah declares:

‘Verily, he truly prospers who purifies himself,’ (87:15)

May Allah always include us among the pure.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Russian Defense









S-400 installed in Dec 2007







..

*********************************************************************
Russia to deploy second S-400 regiment near Moscow in 2008
*********************************************************************

RIA Novisti Russia
01/ 21/2008

MOSCOW, January 21 (RIA Novosti) - Russia will deploy a second regiment equipped with new S-400 air defense systems at the end of 2008, a missile defense official said on Monday.

The new systems will protect the air space around Moscow and industrial zones in the center of the country's European part. The S-400 Triumf (SA-21 Growler) air defense system is expected to form the new cornerstone of Russia's theater air and missile defenses up to 2020 or even 2025.

"We are planning to put a second S-400 regiment on combat duty in the Moscow Region by the end of 2008," said Colonel-General Yuri Solovyov, the head of the Russian Air Force Special Command.

Russia successfully conducted last year live firing tests of the S-400 air defense complex at the Kapustin Yar firing range in south Russia's Astrakhan Region, and deployed a battalion of the first missile regiment equipped with the new system to protect the airspace surrounding Moscow.

The S-400 is designed to intercept and destroy airborne targets at a distance of up to 400 kilometers (250 miles), twice the range of the U.S. MIM-104 Patriot, and 2.5 times that of the S-300PMU-2.

The system is also believed to have high capability to destroy stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles, with an effective range of up to 3,500 kilometers (2,200 miles) and a speed of up to 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) per second.

Solovyov said that in addition to new surface-to-air missiles already in service, S-400 systems must have anti-ballistic missiles that can be used to destroy targets in near space, which would allow full use of the system's capabilities.

A regular S-400 battalion comprises at least eight launchers with 32 missiles and a mobile command post, according to various sources. The new state arms procurement program until 2015 stipulates the purchase of at least 18 S-400 battalions during this period.

The Russian Air Force Special Command currently provides air defense for 140 strategic sites in 13 regions of central Russia, including administrative, industrial, and transportation facilities, and nuclear power stations.



Other related articles...






**********************************************************************
Czech Officials Urge Indus Deals In Missile Shield Project - AFP
**********************************************************************

CNN Money
January 16, 2008: 11:52 AM EST

PRAGUE (AFP)--Czech officials Wednesday called for their country to benefit from specific industrial spin-offs if a U.S. defensive missile shield is to be sited in the Czech Republic.

"This is not only a strategic alliance, it is not only a military alliance but it is also a business alliance that we want to promote," Czech Deputy Foreign Minister Tomas Pojar told a meeting that is to lay the ground for a cooperation agreement.

Czech Deputy Defense Minister Martin Bartak told the two-day missile shield seminar: "We need specific projects.

"In less than a year, negotiations have made good progress," he said, but regretted the "partnership has been only on a political level".

The Czech Republic and Poland have difficult decisions to make on hosting parts of the shield, amid Russian fury at the prospect of U.S. interceptor missiles based so close to its borders.

Washington is currently in negotiations with Warsaw to install 10 interceptor missile sites in Poland by 2012 to ward off potential attacks by so-called rogue states, notably Iran. The U.S. plan calls for associated radar stations in the Czech Republic.

It has scant backing among Czechs and Poles, who fear housing the missile shield would make them targets of attacks by extremists and sour relations with former Cold War ally Russia.

Top U.S. officials and leaders in the country's defense industry had come over for the Prague seminar.

Over 40 Czech companies and institutes were also lined up to attend the meeting where they will be wooed by U.S. defense and aeronautics giants like Raytheon (RTN), Boeing Co. (BA), Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT) and Northrop Grumman (NOC).

"The aim...is to offer the possibility of Czech-U.S. cooperation in the areas of research, development and industrial production of anti-missile defense systems," the Czech foreign ministry has said.

Nancy Morgan of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said talks were in "a broad exploration phase".

Negotiations between Prague and Washington over a framework agreement paving the way for Czech involvement in the missile shield was expected to be launched by the two sides Friday.

Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek hopes to put an agreement on the shield before lawmakers as early as April.

But his new Polish counterpart Donald Tusk is cranking up demands for security guarantees and other concessions from Washington and distancing himself from the unquestioned pro-shield stance of his predecessor.

The U.S. missile defense budget stands at $10 billion, with the cost of deploying the system in the Czech Republic and Poland estimated by the MDA at between $4 billion and $4.5 billion.



**********************************************
Analysis: U.S. rockets face Polish hurdles
**********************************************

Berlin (UPI) Jan 15, 2007

U.S. plans for a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic may be delayed because Poland wants extra security guarantees. Warsaw also hopes a government change in Washington won't affect the controversial system.

It's not easy to be the Polish government these days. Warsaw has said it wants to take the heat out of its difficult relationship with Russia, while at the same time aiming for closer military cooperation with the United States.

Over the weekend, Polish Defense Minister Bogdan Klich called for a special military treaty before negotiations on the U.S. missile shield get to the nitty-gritty on Tuesday in Washington.

"Special military agreements link the United States with certain allies like Italy or Turkey," Klich told the Polish newspaper Dziennik. "The signature of such an accord with Poland seems justified in our view given services rendered to the Americans over recent years."

The reaction by the United States, he said, will be an indicator if Washington really considers Poland as its partner in central Europe. At the moment the United States treats Poland more "like a distant cousin."

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in the past weeks has also called for greater security guarantees for Poland, and according to observers, eyes a Patriot missile air defense system similar to one already deployed in neighboring Germany.

Tusk and his Czech counterpart, Mirek Topolanek, last week at a joint news conference said they were "not in a rush" to strike a deal with Washington on the missile defense system. Both leaders know they have quite a bargaining chip in their hands.

Washington by 2012 wants to install 10 interceptor missile sites in Poland and a radar unit in the Czech Republic to ward off potential attacks by so-called rogue states, namely Iran. However, public opposition against the system is fierce in both countries, with Poles and Czechs fearing they would be a terror target if their governments agreed to harbor U.S. missiles.

That's why Warsaw and Prague are in no rush to give the Americans the green light. They fear that in case of a Democratic victory in the U.S. presidential elections, the system may not be built, but still hand political damage to the governments that have signed on to it. After all, teaming up with the United States in security matters has proved disastrous for several European governments in the past.

A Democratic victory likely won't change the plans significantly, Alexander Bitter, a German military expert, wrote in a recent study published by the German Institute for International and Security affairs, a Berlin-based think tank.

The Russians have also protested heavily against the system, which they say is a tool of NATO's military eastward expansion, a direct threat against Russia and the start of a new arms race in Europe. Washington has denied that, but has since failed to convince Moscow that the system poses no threat but is aimed at protecting U.S. allies in Europe from nuclear attacks.

The new Polish government, frustrated by the diplomatic progress between Washington and Moscow on the issue, has since started to talk to the Kremlin directly, a move the previous government of conservative Prime Minister Jaroslav Kaczynski refused to make. So far, however, the talks have been fruitless.

After meeting with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Kislyak, Polish top diplomat Radek Sikorsk said the discussions with Moscow merely tested the waters.

"I came away with the impression that our neighbor is happy that we are finally talking, but fundamental differences in views remain," he said, according to Deutsche Welle.

While some experts question the technical feasibility of missile defense systems, others say they work well in warding off nuclear attacks while at the same time helping to contain the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

If defense systems exist in strategic locations, a dictator or a leader of a rogue state may then question to finance a multibillion-dollar nuclear weapons program that leads to political isolation and has been rendered militarily useless.

The next weeks will likely bring some developments on the issue, with NATO to discuss missile defense at its summit in Bucharest, Romania, in April 2008. There, talks will circle around the question of whether to join the U.S. efforts in Poland and the Czech Republic.


US ready to meet key condition on missile shield: Poland

The United States is "ready to begin talks" about modernizing the Polish military, a key condition set by Warsaw for allowing US defensive missiles to be sited in Poland, Poland's defense minister said here Tuesday. "The readiness of the American side to talk about this issue is the major result of my visit to Washington," Bogdan Klich told reporters after meeting separately with State Department officials and his US counterpart, Robert Gates. "In Poland, we don't see the right balance between the costs and benefits of the installation of the missiles on our territory, and we would like to improve this ratio with the contribution of our American friends in the process of modernizing our air defense system," Klich said. "I appreciate the declaration of the Americans that they are ready to talk about a US contribution to the modernization of our armed forces," he said. Washington wants to install 10 interceptor missiles in Poland by 2012 as part of a defensive system against possible missile attacks by so-called rogue states such as Iran. The plan calls for associated radar stations in the Czech Republic. Poland's recently installed liberal government, led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, has broken with the previous conservative government's tendency to give unconditional backing to the US proposal to site the missiles in Poland. Klich was the first high-ranking official from the new Polish government, which took office in November, to travel to Washington for talks on the missile defense shield and Poland's contribution to international military missions.











***********************************************************
Japan working on central Tokyo missile shield: official
***********************************************************
Tokyo (AFP) Jan 15, 2008

Japan on Tuesday carried out studies to deploy a missile defence shield in central Tokyo, officials said Tuesday, amid concern that the capital is at risk from North Korea.

The defence ministry conducted investigations on Monday and Tuesday into two locations for US-developed Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) surface-to-air interceptors, a defence spokesman said.

Two PAC-3 units were installed in suburban Tokyo last March as Japan's relations remained tense with nuclear-armed North Korea.

"We took surveys of buildings, which would be obstacles for the PAC-3, and conducted technical tests on communications," the spokesman said.

The sites looked at were Shinjuku Gyoen, a major park in central Tokyo, and the Ichigaya military post on the premises of the defence ministry headquarters, he aid.

"We plan to do more investigations on other sites to seek places that the PAC-3 mobile system can be moved into," he said.

No date has been set for installation of the PAC-3 in central Tokyo. Japan has set a goal of establishing the system at 11 bases by March 2011.

Japan's first Patriot missiles were set up by US forces in 2006 on the southern island of Okinawa.

Japan also plans to conduct a missile test-launch in the US state of New Mexico later this year, he said.

Japan and the United States started working on a more advanced missile shield after North Korea in 1998 fired a missile over Japan's main island.


Russia's S-400 Missile Defense














Russian ICBMs, defense interceptors, AA, SAM


Russian Nuclear Defense and Long Rance Launch Sites


US Nuclear Defense and Long Range Threat Protection
- US wants to build defence system against possible missile attacks
- Part of defences would be in Eastern Europe - which Russia opposes
- Russia suggests US should use its Gabala, Azerbaijan base instead


******************************************************************
S-400 air defense systems to be deployed in central Russia
******************************************************************

RIA Novosti Russia News

January 14 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's advanced S-400 air defense missile systems will be initially deployed in central regions of the country, the Air Force commander said on Monday.

The S-400 Triumf (SA-21 Growler) air defense system is expected to form the new cornerstone of Russia's theater air and missile defenses up to 2020 or even 2025.

"The S-400 air defense systems will be primarily deployed in central Russia, and only after that in other regions of the country, when more systems become available," Col. Gen. Alexander Zelin said.

Russia successfully conducted last year live firing tests of the S-400 air defense complex at the Kapustin Yar firing range in south Russia's Astrakhan Region, and deployed a battalion equipped with the new system to protect the airspace around Moscow.

The S-400 is designed to intercept and destroy airborne targets at a distance of up to 400 kilometers (250 miles), twice the range of the U.S. MIM-104 Patriot, and 2.5 times that of the S-300PMU-2.

The system is believed to have high capability to destroy stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles, with an effective range of up to 3,500 kilometers (2,200 miles) and a speed of up to 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) per second.

A regular S-400 battalion comprises at least eight launchers with 32 missiles and a mobile command post, according to various sources.



**********************************
Belarus to buy Russia’s S-400
**********************************

Belarus Charter 97 News
Dec 21 2007

Russia’s ambassador to Belarus Aleksandr Surikov said in the interview to Russian edition “Vremya Novostei” the military cooperation of the two countries “is in good progress” and mentioned as an example the fact that Belarus is going to buy Russia’s new anti-missile weapon system S-400, which Russia sells our country at inner prices.

The today’s issue of “Vremya Novostei” contains an interview with Alyksandr Surikov, Russia’s ambassador to Belarus.

– Is strengthening of military cooperation between the countries is necessary?

– The military cooperation is in good progress, both presidents confirmed it. Last year we delivered anti-missile systems S-300 in Belarus, which are already in service. Now the Belarusian side wants to buy new systems S-400. We stand ready to sell weapon to Belarus at inner prices of Russian market that, like gas prices, can be lower than world prices.

– What support does Moscow expect from Minsk regarding the US missile defense system deployment?

– The negotiations with the US, as well as with Czech Republic and Poland, on problem of deployment of missile defense system elements are not completed. We are thankful to Belarus for its political approval of our position concerning this issue and one of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE). We are satisfied with what we have now.

– Can the question on reintroduction of nuclear weapon in Belarus be examined?

– As for today, it can’t be examined. In 1990ies Belarus signed the treaty on removing nuclear weapon form its territory, which was signed by Russia, the US and the UK. These three countries guaranteed inviolability of Belarusian borders and its independence. Moscow, Washington and London will stop being guarantors of Belarusian sovereignty. This situation is obviously dangerous for Belarus.

– What are the perspectives of economic cooperation?

– Vladimir Putin and Alyaksandr Lukashenka confirmed their adherence to the agreements reached a year ago. I mean agreement on shared duties on oil products, produced in Belarus of Russian oil. On the worked out formula, this year 70 per cent of taxes goes to Russia’s budget, and 30 per cent – to Belarus’ one. Next year the taxes are to be shared as 80 to 20. The parties confirmed their adherence to the contract, which defines a formula for gas price for the next three years. Gas price for Belarus is known for the first part of 2008, it will be established two or three times more during the year depending on international oil market.

– How can gas price vary?

– It’s difficult to forecast. One doesn’t know what international oil prices will change. If they fall, gas price will reduce, too.








**************************************
Russia warns of Belarus missiles
**************************************

BBC News
Wednesday, 14 November 2007

Russia could place missiles in neighbouring Belarus to counter a planned US missile defence system, a senior Russian general has said.
Col-Gen Vladimir Zaritsky spoke after Belarus, a close ally of Russia, said it would re-equip its forces with new Russian Iskander short-range missiles.

Russia says the US plan to site parts of a missile defence system in Poland and the Czech Republic is a threat.

The US says it is needed to counter missiles fired by states such as Iran.

"Any action must have a counter-action, including with the US anti-missile elements in the Czech Republic and Poland," Gen Zaritsky was quoted as saying by Russia's Itar-Tass news agency.


Gen Zaritsky is the commander of Russia's artillery and rocket forces.

'Battle of words'

The US missile shield system would see a radar site set up in the Czech Republic and a base in Poland for 10 missile interceptors.


Map of US missile defence systems
The chief of staff of Russia's armed forces, Gen Yury Baluyevsky, said on Tuesday that Iran posed no missile threat to Europe or the US and that the missile defence plan would be aimed at Russia.

The US has said that the limited system it proposes could not threaten Russia's own missile arsenal.

Belarus says it will buy Russia's Iskander-E conventional missile system by 2020.

Gen Zaritsky's comments are a new stratagem in bitter battle of words between the US and Russia, says the BBC's James Rodgers in Moscow.

In October, US President George W Bush said: "The need for missile defence in Europe is real and I believe it's urgent."

He warned that Iran could have a ballistic missile capable of reaching Europe or the US by 2015.

A few days later, Russian President Vladimir Putin compared the US plans to the missile crisis of 1962, which saw the US and the Soviet Union go to the brink of nuclear war over Russian missiles in Cuba.


******************************************************
Russia and USA Deadlocked on Missile Defense
******************************************************

RussianSpy.org
January 15, 2008

The tensions between the USA and Russia seem to be building and becoming more strained almost daily.

Russia will not allow other countries to put restrictions on its arms exports, President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday.

President Putin said that Russia would not take into consideration attempts to impose restrictions “based on unilateral and politicized assessments”.

Putin also said deliveries of Russian weapons are focused exclusively at increasing the capability of the countries receiving them, and at maintaining their stability and safety. He did not go into detail regarding these comments. However he did say:
“It is an absolute priority for us. Russia has strictly observed, is observing, and will strictly observe all international commitments in the military technical sphere, in particular, the export control regime,”

U.S.A. authorities have called on Russia to discontinue arms deliveries to countries whose political regimes Washington disapproves of. What are all these countries exactly? Last week, U.S.A. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns urged the Russian government to cease arms deliveries to Iran.

The United States and Russia have had on ongoing deadlock on missile defense in Europe, with the US defense secretary saying the US has gone as far as it can to make Russia happy.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ comments came after Moscow rejected US concessions on its plans for missile interceptors in Poland and a radar in the Czech Republic.
“I guess my view is I think we’ve leaned about as far forward as we can. We’ve offered a lot. And my view is, now I want to see some movement on their part,” Gates told reporters as he flew back from Europe today.

Robert Gates said the USA proposals “represent a very forward-leaning posture in terms of partnering with the Russians.”

“And I think the question is whether the Russians are serious about partnering with us, or whether this is merely a pose to try and stop us from going forward with the Czech Republic and Poland,” he said.

Earlier today Russian Defense Minister Viktor Serdyukov said the US proposals were not enough to satisfy the Russian concerns.

“All that has been proposed to us does not satisfy us, our position remains the same,” the ITAR-TASS and Interfax news agency quoted Serdyukov as saying at a meeting of NATO defense ministers in the Netherlands.

The tougher position by Gates came amid rising US tensions with Iran and a warning by President Bush on Wednesday that missile defenses were urgently needed to defend Europe.
“The need for missile defense in Europe is real, and I believe it is urgent,” Bush said, in a speech at the National Defense University that was interpreted as being at odds with Gates’ softer approach to the Russians.

During a visit to Moscow earlier this month, Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice presented the Russians with ideas for a regional missile defense scheme that would include Russia as well as NATO.

They proposed posting Russian liaison officers at US missile defense sites as well as at the radar site in the Czech Republic if Prague agreed. The Czech leader said: “No comment” when asked if it would be okay to have Russian soldiers in the Czech Republic. There are old tensions between Russia and the Czech Republic.

Gates stated during a trip to Prague, the United States would delay making the European site fully operational until there was “definitive proof of the threat.”

He said Russian leaders have made clear that they recognize that Iran poses a security threat, but differ with Washington on how long it will take the Iranians to develop progressively longer range missiles. Russian thinks this time period is much longer than the the US does.

A US defense official, said the US had offered to tie the activation of the system to a agreed upon understanding with the Russians of what would constitute a proven and real Iranian threat.

“What we are saying is we’re prepared to sit down with Russia and discuss what we would both regard as indications of increasing capability” of Iran’s missiles, the official said.

Gates and US defense officials have said Russian President Vladimir Putin was intrigued enough by the proposals to agree to experts meetings and a follow-on round of talks at the level of defense and foreign ministers.

Russia is concerned about the possibility that the missile defense system could be used against Russia at some point in the future.

The United States, which is still negotiating with Poland and the Czech Republic for access to their territory, insists that the planned missile defense system is no match for Russia’s nuclear arsenal and are aimed at a looming Iranian missile threat. This is a difficult concern for Russia to accept and agree to.






Saturday, January 19, 2008

Rothschild timeline

IGNORE the links at the END... ALL are deceptive



Rothschild Timeline - GREAT detail

HEAVY INFO interview

Prothink, Khanverse, Salman, Leon and several callers discuss a TON of information about Zionist crime/deception

Below are the files, divided by topic:

ENTIRE INTERVIEW

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intro & Manifesto

AIPAC trial background

Salman Part I, HEAVY

Derrick & Salman, Info & Tactics

Leon: Banking & Deception

Russo, Loose Change Deception

MSM's War on Islam

Brayman & AIPAC funding

AIPAC, Israel, USS Liberty

Israel & 9/11 - Outro

Who believes this?

Friday, January 18, 2008

The Signs of God - Friday Flames

Da real Freestyle Friday

Huzur continued with the subject of verse 130 of Surah al Baqarah in his Friday Sermon today. The translation of the verse reads:

[2:130]'And, Our Lord, raise up among them a Messenger from among themselves, who may recite to them Thy Signs and teach them the Book and Wisdom and may purify them; surely, Thou art the Mighty, the Wise'.

Huzur said today he would elucidate on the third aspect of the prayer of Hadhrat Ibrahim (on whom be peace) that indeed the above verse is. The third aspect that he prayed for the great prophet was that may he teach wisdom. Huzur said he has described the various meanings and connotation of the word ‘wisdom’ in his previous sermons; they constitute fairness, absolute justice, knowledge, astuteness and making appropriate use of something in accordance with the suitability of the occasion. Today Huzur explained this word with reference to the great Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) and the Book revealed to him.

Huzur said in the above verse wisdom connotes that the Prophet will establish absolute justice and indeed the Qur’an also asserts the fulfilment of this prayer elsewhere that this is what the Prophet did and that his teachings would continue eternally that his blessed model exemplified the perfect personification of what is in the Book; which is a Seal of the teaching of absolute justice. Huzur said it is not possible to reach the lofty station of the Prophet, however each person must try to the very best of their own capacity to follow his blessed mode.

Speaking on the wisdom of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) with reference to its significance as absolute justice Huzur cited a couple of incidents from his blessed life.

After the battle of Hunain the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) favoured some people in the distribution of the booty to the exclusion of others; a person came and said, ‘By Allah, in this distribution justice has not been observed, nor has Allah's Pleasure been aimed at.’ The Prophet’s (peace and blessings of Allah be on him replied ‘If Allah and His Apostle did not act justly, who else would act justly.’ The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) later explained that he had not usurped the rights of any by giving a large part of the booty to some and had used his right over the distribution of one fifth of the booty in the allocation. He also said that when he gave a larger portion to some he did so owing to their weak faith and avidity.

In another incident Huzur explained that when Surah Al Nasr was revealed the Companions realised the Prophet’s (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) time to depart from this world was near. The prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) gave a sermon which was received by his Companions in an emotional state. The Prophet then announced that if anyone had any reprisal to take they should do so. On this an elderly Companion Ukasha stood up and said that in such and such battle as he had dismounted his camel which had come near the camel of the Prophet the Prophet’s stick, whether purposely or inadvertently had hit him. The Prophet responded that the Prophet of God could not purposely hit him, however, he asked for a stick to be brought and gave it to Ukasha and told him to take his revenge. Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umer and Hadhrat Ali (may Allah be pleased with them all) stood up offering that the retaliation be taken from them. Then Hadhrat Hassan and Hadhrat Hussein (may Allah be pleased with them) stood up and said the retaliation should be taken from them as they were the Prophet’s grandsons. However, Ukasha insisted that he wanted to take the revenge from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) and added that when the stick had hit him he did not have any attire on. On this the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) lifted the cloth from his body and said that Ukasha could strike him. The rest of the Companions started to weep with anguish, however Ukasha went forward and started kissing the blessed body of the Prophet and said who could ever abide taking revenge from him, who had taught varied principles of absolute justice and that he was merely looking for an opportunity to express his love. On the Prophet said that Ukasha either had to retaliate or forgive. Ukasha said O Prophet of God I forgive you in the hope that Allah will forgive me on the Day of Judgement. To this the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) replied if anyone wishes to see my companion in Paradise should take a look at Ukasha.

Next Huzur cited Quranic verses on absolute justice. Citing verse 91 of Surah Al Nahl (16:91) Huzur said this was a most sagacious teaching which carries solutions for societal problems as well as matters of international significance. When evil is avoided high standards of absolute justice are established. Absolute justice is greater then favour and kindness and comes to pass by forsaking what is bad owing to fear of Allah. Absolute justice is not merely recompense or punishment because these do not necessarily reform. Absolute justice is in accordance to the situation. The Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) said that kindness at the wrong juncture is wrong just as it is wrong not to do an act of kindness at the appropriate time. He enjoined to have the courteousness that a mother shows to her child. He said doing good can be on three degrees, the first is where one does good in return of good, the second is where one does good of one’s own accord and is of help/benefit to another, then there is the conducting of good, where there is no thought of doing a favour or no expectation of gratefulness, it is good done in the way a mother does good to her child. Indeed, doing good and justice when applied without any wisdom are not good morals.

Huzur cited verse 9 of Surah Al Maidah (5:9) and said when one claims to have faith then a believer has to staunch in supporting justice. When one acquires this thought-process one naturally exudes absolute justice. The Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) said absolute justice cannot be achieved without honesty.

Wisdom also connotes perfection of knowledge. Huzur said as he had expounded in his previous sermon that in Islam and through the Holy Qur’an Allah perfected religion. Indeed this blessed Book carries many prophecies which have been fulfilled, prophecies which let alone people of 1400 hundreds ago, even the people of a couple of hundred years had no idea.


Huzur cited verses 20 to 24 of Surah Al Rahman (55:20-24) and explained that the reference in these verses of two waters merging has been seen in the form of the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea coming together through the Suez Canal as well as the Panama Canal connecting the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans. Huzur said this was prophesied at a time when there was no knowledge of where these seas could have been.

Verse 31 of Surah Al Anbiya (21:31) clearly expounds the scientific concept that we now know as the Big Bang. In expounding verse 48 of Surah Al Dhariyat (51:48) Huzur said as human knowledge of the world increases this verse (and other verses of the Qur’an) can be translated accordingly. Hadhrat Khalifa tul Masih (may Allah have mercy on him) translated it as: ‘And We have built the heaven with might and We continue to expand it indeed’ in light of the discovery by Edwin Hubble that the universe was continuously expanding. Huzur said at the time of the revelation of this verse there was no concept whatsoever of the universe expanding. Huzur said a few months ago an journal had reported that they now thing the universe is expanding at a greater speed than before.

Huzur said Muslim scientists in particular Ahmadi scientists would not ponder on the Quranic assertions ‘after’ making discoveries, indeed they would base their research on the Quranic words as Dr. Abdus Salam did. Huzur said the Holy Qur’an is full of gems that shall continue to make disclosures till the end of time. As for the wisdom in the commandments of the Shariah as stated in the Holy Qur’an Huzur cited verse 46 of Surah Al Ankabut (29:46) which extols the virtues of Salat. Huzur said this commandment is for the ummah and it illustrates the ways and means to make Divine connection. The Promised Messiah (on whom be peace) said that Salat is an instrument to safeguard oneself and that Salat is the essence of blessings.

Huzur cited part of verse 31 of Surah Al Hajj (22:31) and said that here speaking of untruth is mentioned in conjunction with idolatry to emphasise its seriousness. Huzur said one who uses false speech considers that the ‘idol’ of falsehood would deliver him/her whereas only truth triumphs ultimately. The Promised Messish (on whom be peace) said there was nothing as abominable as falsehood. He said he had seven court cases against him but he did not tell a single lie during these and indeed was exonerated from every single of these cases.
Huzur cited verse 35 of Surah Al Ahzab, (33:35) the translation reads:

‘And remember what is rehearsed in your houses of the Signs of Allah and of wisdom. Verily Allah is the Knower of subtleties, All-Aware’.

Huzur explained that there is indeed reward in reciting the Qur’an, however, the real objective of reading the Qur’an would only be fulfilled when its teachings are put in practice and when the blessed model of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) would be at the forefront of our minds. Huzur said the mention of the Divine attribute of Al Latif (Knowner of subtleties) in the above verse signifies that Allah is aware of what is what is apparent about us and what is hidden/concealed about us. Unless we implement the great teaching of the great Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) in our lives we cannot be true believers. May Allah enable us to understand this sagacious teaching and to put it in practice.

Get educated on the History

Here are several books in PDF that will fill in gaps and reorganize your understanding of recent American and European history which will explain how this crime network has established itself so well in so many countries:

Andrew Hitchcock - Synagogue of Satan (HTML)

George Armstrong - Rothschild Money Trust

Andrey Diky - Jews in Russia and USSR

Maule Ramsey - The Nameless War

Jack Bernstein - My Farewell to Israel

L.B. Woolfolk - The Great Red Dragon (HTML)

Douglas Reed - Controversy of Zion

Arthur Koestler - 13th Tribe (html)

Elizabeth Dilling - Talmud Exposed

The Ugly Truth about ADL

Marching To ZOG

The World Order

Zionism in Russia Directory (HTML)

Satanic Voices, Ancient and Modern

Barbarians inside the Gates

CSIS another Zionist think tank

CSIS, another Zionist think tank

The CSIS is a privately funded, nonpartisan tax-exempt organization with its headquartered in Washington, D.C. No one is really sure who pays these guys’ salaries. Many suspect their salaries inadvertently come from America’s tax-payers. Because CSIS is so influential within the confines of the US Department of Defense it is more than likely that they are a beneficiary of taxpayer dollars. Although this has yet to be proven, we definitely need to have someone trace the money.

The US government takes its direction from these CSIS un-elected individuals. There is little if any mention of these people in the media.

Since the post WWII era, many organizations just like the CSIS have been manipulating the US government to their own power hungry advantage and to their own agenda, without our knowledge. It is time we recognize who these people are and their strategic effects on the US government. It is time to put a stop to their control over America, now! To do this, we need to inform the American people of each organization one by one, alerting Americans to the organizations involved in affecting changes in our country that are illegal and unconstitutional.

Although I will illustrate how other various Neoconservative groups are working together with the CSIS to affect our US government, this article will focus first and mostly on the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The CSIS is made up of Neoconservatives (zionists)

Neoconservatives (zionists) are the bad guys.

The CSIS consists mostly of un-elected Neoconservative individuals who affect US government policy.

The CSIS Advisory Board is composed of both public- and private- sector policymakers, including several members of Congress.
The CSIS Washington Roundtable meets three to four times a year with members of Congress, executive branch officials, and other Washington experts to discuss pressing policy issues of the day.
Neoconservative views dominate the media.

CSIS Neoconservatives are mostly former leftists/liberals who converted to conservatism during the ’70’s and 80’s when Ronald Reagan became President.


“Neoconservatives are followers of Leo Strauss and are commonly known as Straussians. Leo Strauss, a Jew from Nazi German arrived in the US in 1938 and taught at the New School for Social Research. Later he taught at the University of Chicago where he managed to gather about a 100 Ph.D. students who later became disciples of Straussian philosophy and took up important posts in various institutions.”

– Paul Webster, “What it is and how it came about…”


Much more in the link: CSIS, another Zionist think tank

Dual-Citizen Zionists: Partial list

1). Richard Perle----One of Bush's foreign policy advisors, he is the chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. A very likely Israeli government agent, Perle was expelled from Senator Henry Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency (NSA) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security) documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked for the Israeli weapons firm, Soltam. Perle came from one the above mentioned pro-Israel thinktanks, the AEI. Perle is one of the leading pro-Israeli fanatics leading this Iraq war mongering within the administration and now in the media.


2). Paul Wolfowitz----Deputy Defense Secretary, and member of Perle's Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon. Wolfowitz is a close associate of Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military. His sister lives in Israel. Wolfowitz came from the above mentioned Jewish thinktank, JINSA. Wolfowitz is the number two leader within the administration behind this Iraq war mongering. Deputy Secretary of War on 9-11; “dual citizen” of US and Israel; investigated for spying for Israel; former PNAC member; chief architect of Iraq war; forced to resign in World Bank scandal, Zionist


3). Douglas Feith----Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. He is a close associate of Perle and served as his Special Counsel. Like Perle and the others, Feith is a pro-Israel extremist, who has advocated anti-Arab policies in the past. He is closely associated with the extremist group, the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don't agree with its extremist views. Feith frequently speaks at ZOA conferences. Feith runs a small law firm, Feith and Zell, which only has one International office, in Israel. The majority of their legal work is representing Israeli interests. His firm's own website stated, prior to his appointment, that Feith "represents Israeli Armaments Manufacturer." Feith basically represents the Israeli War Machine. Feith also came from the Jewish thinktank JINSA. Feith, like Perle and Wolfowitz, are campaigning hard for this Israeli proxy war against Iraq.


4). Edward Luttwak----Member of the National Security Study Group of the Department of Defence at the Pentagon. Luttwak is reportedly an Israeli citizen and has taught in Israel. He frequently writes for Israeli and pro-Israeli newspapers and journals. Luttwak is an Israeli extremist whose main theme in many of his articles is the necessity of the U.S. waging war against Iraq.


5). Henry Kissinger-----One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle. For detailed information about Kissinger's evil past, read Seymour Hersch's book (Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House). Kissinger likely had a part in the Watergate crimes, Southeast Asia mass murders (Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos), Installing Chilean mass murdering dictator Pinochet, Operation Condor's mass killings in South America, and more recently served as Serbia's Ex-Dictator Slobodan Milosevic's Advisor. He consistently advocates going to war against Iraq. Kissinger is the Ariel Sharon of the U.S. Unfortunately, President Bush nominated Kissinger as chairman of the September 11 investigating commission. It's like picking a bank robber to investigate a fraud scandal.


6). Dov Zakheim----Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for the Department of Defense. He is an ordained rabbi and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship. Zakheim attended attended Jew's College in London and became an ordained Orthodox Jewish Rabbi in 1973. He was adjunct professor at New York's Jewish Yeshiva University. Zakheim is close to the Israeli lobby.


7). Kenneth Adelman-----One of many Pentagon Advisors, Adelman also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle, and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supports going to war against Iraq. Adelman frequently is a guest on Fox News, and often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. Through his hatred or stupidity, he actually called Arabs "anti-Semitic" on Fox News (11/28/2001), when he could have looked it up in the dictionary to find out that Arabs by definition are Semites.


8). I. Lewis Libby -----Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. The chief pro-Israel Jewish advisor to Cheney, it helps explains why Cheney is so gun-ho to invade Iraq. Libby is longtime associate of Wolfowitz. Libby was also a lawyer for convicted felon and Israeli spy Mark Rich, whom Clinton pardoned, in his last days as president.


9). Robert Satloff----U.S. National Security Council Advisor, Satloff was the executive director of the Israeli lobby's "think tank," Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Many of the Israeli lobby's "experts" come from this front group, like Martin Indyk.


10). Elliott Abrams-----National Security Council Advisor. He previously worked at Washington-based "Think Tank" Ethics and Public Policy Center. During the Reagan Adminstration, Abrams was the Assistant Secretary of State, handling, for the most part, Latin American affairs. He played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq, and illegally funding the contra rebels fighting to overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista government. He also actively deceived three congressional committees about his involvement and thereby faced felony charges based on his testimony. Abrams pled guilty in 1991 to two misdemeanors and was sentenced to a year's probation and 100 hours of community service. A year later, former President Bush (Senior) granted Abrams a full pardon. He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration's State Department.


11). Marc Grossman-----Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources at the Department of State. Grossman is one of many of the pro-Israel Jewish officials from the Clinton Administration that Bush has promoted to higher posts.


12). Richard Haass-----Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large. He is also Director of National Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the first Bush (Sr) Administration who sat on the National Security Council, and who consistently advocates going to war against Iraq. Haass is also a member of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.


13). Robert Zoellick-----U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position. He is also one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq and occupying a portion of the country in order to set up setting up a Vichy-style puppet government. He consistently advocates going to war against Iraq.


14). Ari Fleischer----Official White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration. Prominent in the Jewish community, some reports state that he holds Israeli citizenship. Fleischer is closely connected to the extremist Jewish group called the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Qabala, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews. Fleischer was the co-president of Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum. He received the Young Leadership Award from the American Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001.


15). James Schlesinger-----One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supports going to war against Iraq. Schlesinger is also a commissioner of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.


16). David Frum-----White House speechwriter behind the "Axis of Evil" label. He lumps together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war.


17). Joshua Bolten----White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Bolten was previously a banker, former legislative aide, and prominent in the Jewish community.


18). John Bolton----Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. Bolton is also a Senior Advisor to President Bush. Prior to this position, Bolton was Senior Vice President of the above mentioned pro-Israel thinktank, AEI. He recently (October 2002) accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq. He must have forgotten that Israel has 400 nuclear warheads, some of which are thermonuclear weapons (according to a recent U.S. Air Force report).


19). David Wurmser----Special Assistant to John Bolton (above), the under-secretary for arms control and international security. Wurmser also worked at the AEI with Perle and Bolton. His wife, Meyrav Wurmser, along with Colonel Yigal Carmon, formerly of Israeli military intelligence, co-founded the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri),a Washington-based Israeli outfit which distributes articles translated from Arabic newspapers portraying Arabs in a bad light.


20). Eliot Cohen-----Member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor. Like Adelman, he often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. More recently, he wrote an opinion article in the Wall Street Journal openly admitting his rascist hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism.


21). Mel Sembler-----President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. A Prominent Jewish Republican and Former National Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee. The Export-Import Bank facilitates trade relationships between U.S. businesses and foreign countries, specifically those with financial problems.


22). Michael Chertoff ----Assistant Attorney General on 9-11; freed over 100 Israeli spies in the US after 9-11; promoted to head Homeland Security; co-author of the patriot act.“dual citizen” of US and Israel; likely Mossad agent, Zionist


23). Steve Goldsmith----Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush's Jewish domestic policy advisor. He also serves as liaison in the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (White House OFBCI) within the Executive Office of the President. He was the former mayor of Indianapolis. He is also friends with Israeli Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert and often visits Israel to coach mayors on privatization initiatives.


24). Adam Goldman-----White House's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community.


25). Joseph Gildenhorn-----Bush Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community. He was the DC finance chairman for the Bush campaign, as well as campaign coordinator, and former ambassador to Switzerland.


26). Christopher Gersten-----Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families at HHS. Gersten was the former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, Husband of Labor Secretary, Linda Chavez, and reportedly very pro-Israel. Their children are being raised Jewish.


27). Mark Weinberger-----Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy.


28). Samuel Bodman-----Deputy Secretary of Commerce. He was the Chairman and CEO of Cabot Corporation in Boston, Massachusetts.


29). Bonnie Cohen-----Under Secretary of State for Management.


30). Ruth Davis-----Director of Foreign Service Institute, who reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management. This Office is responsible for training all Department of State staff (including ambassadors).


31). Lincoln Bloomfield-----Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs.

32). Philip Zelikow------Zelikow is the executive director of the the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, more commonly known as the 9-11 Commission. Since his January 2003 appointment to the independent commission investigating the events of September 11th, Zelikow has been both praised by the Bush administration for his wide knowledge of the terrorism issue at hand and criticized by outside groups for his close ties to the administration and personal involvement in national security activities. A personal friend and academic collaborator of current National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice and a former member of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Zelikow was part of the transition team between the Clinton and Bush administrations. During this period he briefed incoming security advisors, including Dr. Rice, on issues such as Iraq and al-Qaeda. According to Bush Advisor Karen Hughes, "Mr. Zelikow was recruited by the administration to brief us during the transition because he was one of the foremost experts in the world on al-Qaeda."

33. Jack Abramoff------entertained USG “terrorist” patsy Mohammed Atta on his yacht just before 9-11; convicted criminal lobbyist; ardent Zionist

34). Jay Lefkowitz-----General Counsel of the Office of Budget and Management.


35). Ken Melman-----White House Political Director.

36). William Kristol-—--PNAC co-founder; adherent of Leo Strauss; editor of The Weekly Standard; strong advocate of the Iraq war; “dual citizen” of US and Israel; Zionist

37). Michael Cherkasky-----CEO of Kroll on 9-11; former investigator in the Manhattan DA’s Office from 1978 to 1994; now CEO of insurance-firm Marsh & McClennan, Zionist

38). Jules Kroll-----founder of Kroll Corporation, a “security services” company which was in charge of “security” at WTC on 9-11; has close links to CIA and is active private military contractor in Iraq; Zionist

39). George Tenet-----director of the CIA on 9-11; was awarded the “Medal of Freedom” by Bush for his fine work on 9-11; reported to be “dual citizen” of US and Israel, Zionist

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Rothschild Money Trust

I can't wait to dig in on this book, I expect it'll fill some holes, check it out:

Rothschild Money Trust - PDF

"Terrorists", Freedom Fighters and the Holy Land

we need more fiery people to speak truth to power like my brother below:

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

AIPAC spy trial info/links

Take EVERYTHING with a TEASPOON of salt.

STOP AIPAC

A collection of articles on the case

The REAL AIPAC spy ring story: IRAN

American Prospect on AIPAC trial

^Take a close look at that one, it seems like Disinfo to me, which is why this topic is so sticky. Traverse the topic carefully.

The AIPAC spy case trial involves Larry Franklin, a former pentagon analyst, who was charged, prosecuted and sentenced to 12 years for passing classified US military information to two AIPAC employees, Keith Weissman and Steven J Rosen.

See James Petras’s article: AIPAC On Trial

In August 2004, the FBI and the US Justice Department counter-intelligence bureau announced that they were investigating a top Pentagon analyst suspected of spying for Israel and handing over highly confidential documents on US policy toward Iran to AIPAC which in turn handed them over to the Israeli Embassy. The FBI had been covertly investigating senior Pentagon analyst, Larry Franklin and AIPAC leaders, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman for several years prior to their indictment for spying. On August 29, 2005 the Israeli Embassy predictably hotly denied the spy allegation. On the same day Larry Franklin was publicly named as a spy suspect. Franklin worked closely with Michael Ledeen and Douglas Feith, then Undersecretary for Defense in the Pentagon, in fabricating the case for war with Iraq. Franklin was the senior analyst on Iran, which is at the top of AIPAC's list of targets for war.


Franklin's involvment revealed other links especially within the OSP (office of special plans) a zionist controlled outfit of the DOD (department of defense) largely responsible for the fabrication of "evidence" of Iraq's pursuit of WMD, specifically that Saddam was acquiring yellowcake uranium via Niger.

More from Petras:

The FBI investigation of the Washington spy network deepened and included the interrogation of two senior members of Feith's Office of Special Plans, William Luti and Harold Rhode. The OSP was responsible for feeding bogus intelligence leading to the US attack of Iraq. The leading FBI investigator, Dave Szady, stated that the FBI investigation involved wiretaps, undercover surveillance and photography that document the passing of classified information from Franklin to the men at AIPAC and on to the Israelis.

The Franklin-AIPAC-Israeli investigation was more than a spy case. It involved the future of US-Middle East relations and more specifically whether the '",neo-cons' would be able to push the US into a military confrontation with Iran. Franklin was a top Pentagon analyst on Iran, with access to all the executive branch deliberations on Iran. AIPAC lobbying and information gathering was aggressively directed toward pushing the Israeli agenda on a US-Iranian confrontation against strong opposition in the State Department, CIA, military intelligence and field commanders.



From the NY Times :

Before his sentencing, Mr. Franklin pleaded guilty to three felony counts for improperly retaining and disclosing classified information in exchange for his cooperation and the government's willingness to drop three other charges against him. He will not have to begin serving his sentence until after the completion of legal proceedings against Mr. Rosen and Mr. Weissman, who are scheduled to go on trial in April. That could lead prosecutors to agree to seek a reduction in Mr. Franklin's sentence, government official said.

Mr. Rosen and Mr. Weissman were charged in an indictment in August 2005 with conspiring to gather and disclose classified national security information to journalists and an unnamed foreign power that government officials identified as Israel. Aipac dismissed the two men in April 2005.

The indictment said the two men had disclosed classified information about a number of subjects, including American policy in Iran, terrorism in central Asia, Al Qaeda and the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers apartment in Saudi Arabia, which killed 23 Americans, mainly members of the military. Lawyers for the two men have sought to have the indictment against them dismissed.

As Aipac's director of foreign policy issues, Mr. Rosen was a well-known figure in Washington who helped the organization define its lobbying agenda on the Middle East and forged important relationships with powerful conservatives in the Bush administration. Mr. Weissman was a senior Middle East analyst. Mr. Rosen and Mr. Weissman have denied any wrongdoing.

Mr. Franklin, who was regarded as an Iran expert, was among Bush administration conservatives who had pushed for an aggressive policy towards Iran, including a more confrontational approach to restrain its nuclear program.

Mr. Franklin worked at the Pentagon for a time under Douglas Feith, a former undersecretary at the agency. Mr. Franklin has said he developed a relationship with the two lobbyists in the belief that they had access to officials a the National Security Council and could communicate his views to senior officials there.

In addition to his meetings with the lobbyists, the government charged, Mr. Franklin also met with an Israeli embassy official and passed on secret military information about weapons tests in the Middle East and military activities in Iraq. He contended that the information was already known to the Israelis and that he obtained far more information than he gave away.


This investigation spanned nearly 3 years as the FBI gathered evidence against Rosen and Weissman who were up high-up in AIPAC. Larry Franklin also had ties to Zionist Jews in the Department of Defense, notably Richard Perle and Douglas Feith who both resigned shortly after Franklin and his cohorts were implicated in the investigation.

Despite the mountains of evidence piled up against the AIPAC employees and their Israeli Zionist Dual-Citizen benefactors in key positions in government, Judge Ellis III has considered dropping charges based on loopholes in ancient laws. -

I would caution against wholly accepting everything from Anti-War.com given their past obstinacy in vociferously denying the blatant role of Israel in 9/11, however they have a few interesting articles on the AIPAC trial.

See:

Is the media sabotaging the AIPAC trial?

Espionage and Legal Sabotage

AIPAC spy net exposed

One of the best references and resources I’ve found is here: Huge database of info on AIPAC spying

And here is a history of it: AIPAC Spy Trial Timeline

One of the tricks or loopholes used by the "defendents" has been to say that this was a routine that involved many others, high up in the government including Condi Rice and Stephen Hadley. This clause forced Judge Ellis III to subpeona other officials high in government because the spy case reaches up in the food chain.

Ron Paul Debate & Racism

Several Paul supporters and Prothink & Khanverse discuss Ron Paul, the Fed, 9/11, zionism, media, and vote fraud.

MP3 download

Listen to it, if you feel it's worthy, SPREAD it FAR AND WIDE

Lew Rockwell, racist ghostwriter?