Friday, February 29, 2008

New Myspace "rules"

"Myspace" tryin to kill the 'free speech' for REAL,

Saul Goode, make BLOGSPOT and WORDPRESS websites! It takes like 3 min to set up!

Stop f-ing solely with myspace yo, it's gonna get SAVAK style bogus, they know they are facilitating massive information flows, so just make websites and link to them from myspace,

my website is being censored heavily by google who has been watching ME extensively and blockin me from ALL search engines,

(click them to enlarge)

my individual links never show up, only the other places I've posted the articles, like for example, Islam: what the West REALLY needs to KNOW DOESN'T APPEAR in ANY search AT ALL, but it shows all the other websites where I posted the article

but no matter what your thing is, whether health, politics, 'enlightenment', whatever, START WEBSITES all over the place and link to one another

here's mine:

Now look at these new 'rules'

Content/Activity Prohibited. The following are examples of the kind of Content that is illegal or prohibited to post on or through the MySpace Services. MySpace reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate legal action against anyone who, in MySpace's sole discretion, violates this provision, including without limitation, removing the offending Content from the MySpace Services and terminating the Membership of such violators. Prohibited Content includes, but is not limited to, Content that, in the sole discretion of MySpace:

8.1 is patently offensive and promotes racism, bigotry, hatred ("anti-semitism" ? cuz anti-islam is totally fine) or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual


8.6 publicly posts information that poses or creates a privacy or security risk to any person;

you mean like saying who is running the CFR?
or a laundry list of Dual Citizen Israelis in Government?

8.7 constitutes or promotes information that you know is false or misleading or promotes illegal activities or conduct that is abusive, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous;

ah you mean like tellin the TRUTH about Israel & 9/11??

Now look at THIS:

The following are examples of the kind of activity that is illegal or prohibited on the MySpace Website and through your use of the MySpace Services. MySpace reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate legal action against anyone who, in MySpace's sole discretion, violates this provision, including without limitation, reporting you to law enforcement authorities. Prohibited activity includes, but is not limited to:

8.25 for band, comedy, filmmaker and other profiles containing a MySpace player, copying the code for your MySpace Player and embedding it (or directing others to embed it) anywhere other than your band profile on MySpace;

bogus huh? if i post my audios in a bulletin i gotta pay a fine?

8.18 advertising to, or solicitation of, any Member to buy or sell any products or services through the unauthorized or impermissible use of the MySpace Services. You may not transmit any chain letters or junk email to other Members. In order to protect our Members from such advertising or solicitation, MySpace reserves the right to restrict the number of emails which a Member may send to other Members in any 24-hour period to a number which MySpace deems appropriate in its sole discretion. If you breach this Agreement and send unsolicited bulk email, instant messages or other unauthorized commercial communications of any kind through the MySpace Services, you acknowledge that you will have caused substantial harm to MySpace, but that the amount of such harm would be extremely difficult to ascertain. As a reasonable estimation of such harm, you agree to pay MySpace $50 for each such unsolicited email or other unauthorized commercial communication you send through the MySpace Services;

Read the rest of these rules here

Organic food; Healthy self sufficiency

Eugenics, Cloning, Cyborgs, Mass Mind Control

very interesting stuff, don't agree with everything though... esp. not the known shills like Russo at the bottom.
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Eddie
Date: Feb 28, 2008 2:12 PM

One day... we will all be chipped, cloned, hard wired into the internet, turned into cyborgs by nano-DNA-bots, and turned into products and slaves. We will no longer be born. We will all be harvested by the machines.


Five Large-Scale Attempts To Change The Course Of
Human Evolution

Charles Darwin first explained the principles of sexual selection in his controversial book The Descent of Man (1871). Ever since then, people have wanted to tinker with human evolution via artificial sexual selection. Dictators, mad doctors, and crazed social scientists have proposed -- and even carried out -- human breeding experiments aimed at improving the species. For some definition of "improving." Here are five of the most bizarre and tragic experiments with human evolution from the last century.

The Eugenics Movement

The most famous example of eugenics in action is Adolf Hitler's forced breeding program, in which SS officers systematically impregnated women deemed to be appropriately Aryan. The children, bred in a program called Lebensborn, were supposed to be the beginning of a new master race. Hitler's evolutionary intervention also involved genocides of "undesirables," because while you're building a new race, why not get rid of the supposedly undesirable ones too? The Eugenics movement didn't start with Hitler, though. It had a long, rich history that began in the nineteenth century and was very popular in the United States. Early twentieth-century country fairs in the U.S. often featured eugenics contests at country fairs, with awards going to the most "genetically sound" white families. Below, you can see a group of girls from a 4H club who won in a genetic fitness contest circa 1925.

Nicolae Ceausescu's Decree No. 770

In the late 1960s, Romanian dictator Ceausescu decided that the population of his country needed to grow much larger to provide strapping workers for industrial labor. First he tried to reward women who had several babies, but that program didn't work quickly enough. So in 1966, he outlawed abortion. Women were forbidden from using contraception, and underwent fertility checks at work. In 1967, the birth rate in the country doubled. The children born that year were called Decreteii, or children of the decree. Many suffered or died young because they were unwanted or had been born under adverse circumstances.

Chinese 1 Child Per Couple Policy

To cut back on its population, the Chinese government in the early 1980s mandated that each couple may have only one child or suffer penalties. There have been widespread reports of couples choosing to abort or abandon girl children. In some areas of the country, this breeding program has turned homo sapiens into a species whose male population exceeds its female population by 163.5 to 100. Apparently the UN recommends a "normal" ratio is no more than 107 to 100.


Clonaid is a company that purports to be engaging in human cloning, specifically to change the human species. They were embroiled in scandal when it was revealed that many Clonaid "scientists" were members of the Raelian cult (or religion, depending on how you feel about it) that believed humans were descended from cloned aliens. Scientists from Clonaid claim to have cloned a human, though they offer no concrete proof. So far, they have had zero impact on human evolution, but get points for trying to achieve evolutionary intervention via publicity.

Fertility Treatments and IVF

Two years ago, 3 million babies had been born world-wide thanks to IVF and other fertility treatments. In a scenario of pure, wild Darwinian sexual selection, none of those babies would have been born. Those 3 million plus babies represent a dramatic shift in human evolution that we are only beginning to understand.


The public's often skewed view of nanotechnology is shaped by illustrations like this speculative - and, to a physicist, highly implausible - rendition of a "nanorobot" inside a human vein. The nanorobot is pictured removing a blockage from the blood vessel using nano-scale cutters and vacuum cleaners. Credit: Julian Baum/Science Photo Library.

Machines 'to match man by 2029'

Science reporter, BBC News, Boston
16 February 2008
By Helen Briggs

Machines will achieve human-level artificial intelligence by 2029, a leading US inventor has predicted.

Humanity is on the brink of advances that will see tiny robots implanted in people's brains to make them more intelligent, said Ray Kurzweil.

The engineer believes machines and humans will eventually merge through devices implanted in the body to boost intelligence and health.

"It's really part of our civilisation," Mr Kurzweil explained.

"But that's not going to be an alien invasion of intelligent machines to displace us."

Machines were already doing hundreds of things humans used to do, at human levels of intelligence or better, in many different areas, he said.

Man versus machine

"I've made the case that we will have both the hardware and the software to achieve human level artificial intelligence with the broad suppleness of human intelligence including our emotional intelligence by 2029," he said.

"We're already a human machine civilisation; we use our technology to expand our physical and mental horizons and this will be a further extension of that."

Humans and machines would eventually merge, by means of devices embedded in people's bodies to keep them healthy and improve their intelligence, predicted Mr Kurzweil.

"We'll have intelligent nanobots go into our brains through the capillaries and interact directly with our biological neurons," he told BBC News.

The nanobots, he said, would "make us smarter, remember things better and automatically go into full emergent virtual reality environments through the nervous system".

Mr Kurzweil is one of 18 influential thinkers chosen to identify the great technological challenges facing humanity in the 21st century by the US National Academy of Engineering.

The experts include Google founder Larry Page and genome pioneer Dr Craig Venter.

The 14 challenges were announced at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston, which concludes on Monday.

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Eddie
Date: Feb 15, 2008 2:12 PM

We The People Will Not Be Chipped-Resistance is NOT futile , we will NOT be assimilated

The new Nazi swastika - RFID microchips

RFID VeriChip ready to be injected into you and your newborn upon ECONOMIC COLLAPSE

The six-storey Paul Allen Center for Computer Science and Engineering will be the setting for the study.

Future Of Social Networking Explored In UW's Computer Science Building

Seattle WA (SPX) Feb 13, 2008

Contact: Hannah Hickey
University of Washington

If you need information, the Internet offers a wealth of resources. But if you're hunting down a person or a thing, a computer's not much help. That may soon change. Electronic tags promise to create what some call the "Internet of things," in which objects and people are connected through a virtual network.

To see what this future world would be like, a pilot project involving dozens of volunteers in the University of Washington's computer science building provides the next step in social networking, wirelessly monitoring people and things in a closed environment.

Beginning in March, volunteer students, engineers and staff will wear electronic tags on their clothing and belongings to sense their location every five seconds throughout much of the six-story building. The information will be saved to a database, published to Web pages and used in various custom tools. The project is one of the largest experiments looking at wireless tags in a social setting.

The RFID Ecosystem project aims to create a world that many technology experts predict is just on the horizon, said project leader Magda Balazinska, a UW assistant professor of computer science and engineering. The project explores the use of radio-frequency identification, or RFID, tags in a social environment. The team has installed some 200 antennas in the Paul Allen Center for Computer Science and Engineering.

Early next month researchers will begin recruiting 50 volunteers from about 400 people who regularly use the building.

"Our goal is to ask what benefits can we get out of this technology and how can we protect people's privacy at the same time," Balazinska said. "We want to get a handle on the issues that would crop up if these systems become a reality."

The Ecosystem can alert users when they have left something behind.

Many businesses already use RFID tags to track products in the supply chain. Now the tool is moving to other areas. Some transit agencies use radio tags in bus and train passes. The new U.S. passports incorporate RFID tags. Technology experts predict that RFID tags will soon be incorporated in consumer devices, such as cell phones, laptops and music players.

Each tag, which looks a bit like a thin, flexible credit card, costs about 20 cents to produce. A specialized reader can scan the card through any non-metal barrier and from up to 30 feet away, depending on the type of tag. RFID tags are miniature computer chips that contain far more information than a barcode. Also, you can write to an RFID tag--meaning the signal could not only identify the item, but what group it belongs to, when it was last seen, and other information.

The technology has already proven its use in tracking goods. A manufacturer can identify a cart of hamburger patties and know which plant it came from, when it shipped out and a history of its temperature during transit. UW computer-science staff members have already requested to participate in the study so that they will be able to track their equipment as it is moved through the building.

But for people, the technology's power raises questions. An RFID card can be read from a distance and without the wearer's knowledge. The associated databases archive vast amounts of information.

"What if RFID readers were everywhere, and everything had RFID tags? What are the pluses and minuses? What do you do with all that data?" said Gaetano Borriello, a UW professor of computer science and engineering. "In computer science, we try to create a future world that doesn't exist yet. We'd like to get some experience rather than just conjecture about this."

Separate tags are attached to a purse, book, name badge and laptop adaptor (clockwise from top left).

The researchers received human subjects approval to conduct the trial. Each participant will be able to control who can see his or her data, and can delete any data or opt out of the study at any time without explanation or penalty. Researchers also note that they have not placed any RFID readers near bathrooms or eating areas, because these are considered personal spaces.

Study volunteers will be interviewed periodically. The researchers will be assessing both positive aspects, such as keeping track of everything from where you lost your laptop charger to where your friends are meeting for coffee, and negative aspects in terms of loss of privacy.

"Even if you wanted to study just privacy, or just utility, you'd have to study the other as well," said Evan Welbourne, a UW doctoral student in computer science and engineering. "People are more likely to give out information if there's a benefit to them. You can't really separate issues of privacy from issues of utility."

Research members have been testing the system on themselves. Over the past year, all 10 members of the group have worn the tags on their necks and placed them on certain belongings. Balazinska set the system so that she can't see her students, but she allows them to access her data. The students occasionally used the alerts to catch their adviser on her way out of the building. Many members of the team reported using the database to find out where they had left their belongings.

The pilot study will incorporate two new student-developed features that aim to exploit the system's potential benefits. One invention is a tool that records a person's movements in Google Calendar. Study participants can set the system to instantaneously publish activities on their Web calendar, such as arrival at work, meetings or lunch breaks.

"It's a perfect memory system that records all your personal interactions throughout the day," Welbourne said. "You can go back a day later, a month later, and see, 'What did I do that day?' or, 'Who have I spent my time with lately?'"

Another tool is a friend finder, named RFIDder (pronounced "fritter"). This sends instant alerts to participants' e-mail addresses or cell phones telling them when friends are in certain places. With RFIDder, each user can specify who is allowed to see their data. They can change the settings at any time, and can easily turn it off whenever they don't want to be found. The system will link to Twitter, an online blog that lets people post their whereabouts online.

"We want to observe how a group of people uses these tools, whether they find them useful, how they adapt them," Balazinska said.

Researchers are also devising ways to deal with the many technical challenges involved in sorting RFID data. As data floods in, the researchers would like to make sense of it. They also want to develop a main database where people can find the information they need, but can't abuse it by looking at too much of other people's personal information. Proposals include systems that would impose a cost for looking up certain types of information, or that would let people see who is accessing their data.

A major research focus is extracting information from imperfect data. Metal can block the RFID signal and using the data to figure out people's actual position is tricky. Current systems combine artificial intelligence and database techniques to produce usable information, Balazinska said.

"This is a major project that has many facets," Balazinska said. "We worry that these technologies are being implemented too quickly, and with this system we want to explore it in a controlled environment, to inform the public and policymakers about issues we might face."

The project is funded by the National Science Foundation, Microsoft Research and the UW's College of Engineering.

The late Aaron Russo warned of Rockefeller bankers plan to RFID tag EVERYONE

IBM, VeriChip and the 4th Reich

US military already implanted our soldiers with RFID VeriChips

What is VeriChip? What will it do to you?

Paul Robeson

Exquisite Mind

Thursday, February 28, 2008

More on Uncle Otoma

what was I thinking?

^obviously with that dude running as Nader's VP, he's not gonna be "objective" but uh, Nader is way better than Fall and Obama.

What a big waste of time presidential selections are, no?

Monsters murder more Palestinians

The monsters never stop.

And the muslims everywhere are suffering from subversive, sellout puppets. Abbas is no different, this despicable goon is working for them

Palestinians woke up early Thursday on what it seemed to be their regular alarm, the sound of Israeli rockets and raids. And instead of bidding farewell to nine martyrs, now they have to mourn 28, including eight children.

Israeli occupation security forces struck a range of targets in the West Bank and Gaza Strip on Thursday, killing a total of 15 Palestinians, including four children. The deaths come a day after the occupation army martyred 13 Palestinians. Early Thursday evening, an Israel Air Force helicopter attacked a police roadblock near the Gaza City home of Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, in which Palestinian officials said one person was martyred and four others wounded.

Four children - all under the age of 16 and three from the same family - were martyred in an IAF strike in Jabalya, a refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip. Another IAF attack in northern Gaza a short while later martyred a Hamas resistance fighter. Earlier, IAF aircraft struck northern Gaza, killing another Hamas member and one other person.

On Thursday morning, three resistance fighters were martyred in an Israeli strike in the Gaza neighborhood of Sajaiya. Two of the men martyred belonged to the Popular Resistance Committees' military wing and the third was a Hamas fighter. Palestinian sources reported that another fighter was wounded in the strike.

In the Gaza City neighborhood of Zeitoun, an IAF strike martyred two Hamas members, including son of senior Hamas lawmaker, Khalil al-Haya. The group said he had commanded a rocket-launching squad in northern Gaza. Al-Haya is one of Hamas' top figures in Gaza, and has escaped assassination attempts, including an IAF strike that killed his brother last year.

Visiting the morgue at Gaza City's Shifa hospital Thursday, Khalil al-Haya said he was proud that his son had lost his life for the Hamas cause, like many of his relatives. "I thank God for this gift, he said. This is the 10th member of my family to receive the honor of martyrdom."

Two other Palestinian resistance fighters were martyred by the occupation army during an operation in the West Bank town of Nablus, local sources reported. One of the martyrs belonged to the Popular Front's armed wing – the Abu Mustafa Brigades, and the other was a member of Fatah's military wing, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. Six other Palestinians were injured in the attack.

Moreover, overnight Israeli aircraft struck the empty office of Haniyeh and nearby premises of his Interior Ministry, killing a 6-month old baby and wounding more than 30 other people. Earlier on Wednesday, three Palestinian children were killed in an Israeli strike in the northern Gaza Strip. The children were aged 10, 12, and 14. Occupation army also killed nine Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank; five of the martyrs belonged to Hamas military wing.

Hamas retaliated for the Israeli crimes by launching more 50 Qassam rockets in 24 hours into the western Negev town of Sderot and the surrounding communities killing one Israeli settler and wounding several others. Many settlers were treated for shock.

One of the wounded was an officer belonging to Israeli Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter's protection detail. The security officer was at the place for preliminary scouting of the area in preparation for the minister's visit.

On Thursday, PA President Mahmoud Abbas said that he does not rule out returning to the path of armed "resistance" against Israel and took pride in the fact that he had been the first to fire on Israel in 1965. In an interview with the Jordanian daily al-Dustur, Abbas said that he was opposed to an armed struggle against Israel - for the time being. "At this present juncture, I am opposed to the armed struggle because we can't succeed in it, but maybe in the future things will be different," he said.

Am I wrong about Obama?

Probably not.

Even if I am, Nader is still WEIGH better.

you know it's POSSIBLE obama hasn't been fully corrupted by washington and is toeing the line to get elected...

but he did vote to fund a war he didn't support EVERY TIME

here's an interesting take

although i never trusted this guy Raimando either

i tossed obama a heartfelt prayer regardless, we can all hope he's gonna pull a kennedy so if that's the case, may allah be his protector...

the part that stuck out to me which i did NOT know about was this:

The Clintons are desperately trying to spin this away, with President Priapus denouncing Obama's antiwar record as "a fairy tale" and The New Republic rather more subtly suggesting "Obama himself may understand that the issue is more complicated than his condemnations of Hillary Clinton's judgment." That's the last line of a rather curious piece by Michael Crowley, whose microscopic examination of Obama's public pronouncements on the war question might have been published by – except for that last line.

It is a piece that starts out by chronicling Obama's memorable performance at a 2002 antiwar rally in Chicago – when very few mainstream politicians were showing up at antiwar events – and charts his subsequent equivocations, wobbles, and doubts, slyly implying that he's not really all that far away from being a calculating Clintonian himself. Crowly cites the Clintonites' contention that the liberal district he hailed from in Chicago meant he wasn't really going out on a limb in opposing the war early on, an argument that makes no sense when one remembers he was getting ready to run for US Senate. Statewide, support for the war, while not as fervent as in some other regions of the country, was generally reflective of the post-9/11 hysteria that made warmongering such a lucrative profession for so many. As Thomas B. Edsall pointed out in the Huffington Post:

"Among all Illinois voters, 17 percent said the U.S. should attack Iraq with or without allied support, 51 percent said an attack should be initiated only with the backing of allies, and 18 percent said the U.S. should not attack at all. Among Democrats, only 8 percent backed a unilateral invasion of Iraq, 59 percent said the US should attack only with broad allied support and 23 percent opposed any military action."

People wanted more evidence that an attack was necessary – 52 percent – but, in general, the good people of Illinois went along with the national zeitgeist, which was all about "taking out" Saddam Hussein and showing those Ay-rabs who's in charge. After all, a mere 23 percent opposed going to war at all, and that's where Obama was. The only reason he avoided paying the political price was due to extraordinary luck: his principal opponent in the Democratic primary was hit with a major scandal and effectively knocked out of the race. The same fate befell his putative Republican opponent – and the eventual GOP nominee, Alan Keyes, was never a credible opponent to begin with.

So, yes, it took courage to come out against the war at that point. Remember, the post-9/11 Bizarro Effect still had most of the country in its hallucinatory grip, and the War Party and the "mainstream" media were collaborating on a propaganda campaign of unprecedented ferocity, broadcasting brazen lies as if they were fact and trying to bully anyone who defied them, e.g. Democrats Mike Thompson, Jim McDermott and David Bonior.

Yet there was more than courage on display at that rally. There was also Obama's prescience. It's odd that Crowley opens his piece with the scene from that rally, but somehow neglects to report what Obama said:

"What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne....

"I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

"But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars." (Obama, 2002)

With most of the rest of the country swept up in an emotional rush of belligerence-in-search-of-a-target, Obama kept his cool and clearly perceived the facts as most of us would later come to see them. This is called judgement – another name for it is leadership.

That's why he's winning, beating Hillary and her much-vaunted "machine," and why the Clintonites have half-unveiled their ultimate weapon: the dreaded "super-delegates," primed to snatch the nomination away from Obama and his majority of pledged (i.e. elected) delegates at the last moment. Furthermore, he looks, acts, and sounds like a president, whereas Hillary merely reminds one of a high school class president (and Edwards the prom king).

he's apparently scarin some hardcore pro-war Yahudis.

I'm not gonna "support" someone who will bend over backward for ashkeNAZIs but I will say that there is an outside chance he hasn't been sufficiently blackmailed and he's just toeing the line. I don't wanna hold optimism in the process though, as I've thought myself that Clinton was the choice long ago.

we'll see what happens...

The rapid spread of factual information is the only true solution at this point other than Allah

Institutionalized Racism

Moorish contributions to the West

I got side tracked with dumb stuff this month, I meant to post more stuff on "black" history but there's no reason why that should be limited to Feb so expect more and more on the subject as I come across it or re-familiarize myself with it.


Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Uncle Otoma

what a pathetic fool.

i mean tool.

yea, just bend over and take it from the folks that enslaved your people in the Americas.

Can anyone say, "shirk"

you can't upset God's chosen people or ELSE!


^don't steal that, I made it.

In case you missed it bro. Cornell broke it down for us:

If you wanna vote for someone "different", vote for CYNTHIA MCKINNEY whose testicular fortitude far exceeds that of the Uncle "Hopeful Change" Otoma. She actually gotten things accomplished which is why the zionist lobby funded her opposition, another worshipper of all things kosher, Hank Johnson, and maligned her in the media


Holographic Universe II

Very interesting concept indeed. The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbott is a MIND-BLOWING book

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

What would Jesus buy?

glad someone is addressing the out of shopoholism and materialism rampant in the West

Bollyn's Archive

Archive of Bollyn's work PRE-disappearance

US/NATO running Global Afghan Heroin Trade

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Eddie
Date: Feb 26, 2008 1:15 PM

Kosovo drug mafia supply heroin to Europe



AFGHANISTAN OPIUM: Financing the Enemy; Expanding the War


Narco Aggression: Russia accuses the U.S. military of involvement in drug trafficking out of Afghanistan

by Vladimir Radyuhin

Global Research, February 24, 2008

The global proceeds of the Afghan drug trade is in excess of 150 billion dollars a year. There is mounting evidence that this illicit trade is protected by the US military.

Historically, starting in the early 1980s, the Afghan drug trade was used to finance CIA covert support of the Islamic brigades. The 2003 war on Afghanistan was launched following the Taliban government's 2000-2001 drug eradication program which led to a collapse in opium production in excess of 90 percent.

The following report, which accuses the United States of using military transport planes to ship narcotics out of Afghanistan confirms what is already known and documented regarding the Golden Crescent Drug Trade and its insiduous relationship to US intelligence.

Russia, facing a catastrophic rise in drug addiction, accuses the U.S. military of involvement in drug trafficking from Afghanistan.

February 23, 2008

Afghan workers cutting open poppy bulbs, the first stage in the harvesting process, in Jalalabad.

Afghanistan produced 8,200 tonnes of opium last year, enough to make 93 per cent of the world’s heroin supply.

Could it be that the American military in Afghanistan is involved in drug trafficking? Yes, it is quite possible, according to Russia’s Ambassador to Afghanistan Zamir Kabulov.

Commenting on reports that the United States military transport aviation is used for shipping narcotics out of Afghanistan, the Russian envoy said there was no smoke without fire.

“If such actions do take place they cannot be undertaken without contact with Afghans, and if one Afghan man knows this, at least a half of Afghanistan will know about this sooner or later,” Kabulov told Vesti, Russia’s 24-hour news channel. “That is why I think this is possible, but cannot prove it.”

Afghan narcotics are an extremely painful issue for Russia. They first hit the Russian market during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s when Russian soldiers developed a taste for Afghan heroin and smuggled it back to Russia.

The disintegration of the Soviet Union in December 1991 threw open the floodgates of drug trafficking from Afghanistan across Central Asia to Russia and further west to Europe. Afghanistan’s narcotics struck Russia like a tsunami, threatening to decimate its already shrinking population. According to the Federal Drug Control Service, 90 per cent of all heroin sold in Russia comes from Afghanistan. Russia today has about six million drug-users – a 20-fold increase since the collapse of the Soviet Union and a huge figure for a country of 142 million people.

The Federal Drug Control Service said earlier in January that as many as 30 to 40 million people in Russia may have tried drugs at least once. Annually, some 80,000 Russians die of drug-related causes. One in five crimes committed in Russia is related to drugs. The illegal drug turnover in Russia is estimated at between $10 and $15 billion, discounting transit trafficking.

Narcotics have become an integral part of the youth subculture in Russia. In Moscow alone narcotics are sold at about 100 discotheques and cafes frequented by young people, the city drug control service reported in December. About 45 per cent of Russian university students use drugs, according to Russian Minister for Education and Science Andrei Fursenko. He described the situation as “critical”. The Moscow city government plans to introduce mandatory drug tests for all students in the Russian capital this year. Schoolchildren may be next in line for screening: some surveys indicate that four out of five young Russians are familiar with drugs. The Russian Parliament is planning to discuss a law to allow compulsory treatment of drug and alcohol addicts.

President Vladimir Putin has described the drug abuse problem as a “national calamity”. The catastrophic rise in drug addiction in Russia has been spurred by the painful transition from socialism to capitalism that Russia has been going through since 1991. Millions lost their jobs and were reduced to abject poverty during Russia’s worst-ever economic meltdown in the 1990s. But external factors have played a crucial role in the spread of drugs. Last year Putin bluntly stated that Russia and Europe had been victims of “narco-aggression”.

When the Soviet Union broke up into 15 independent states, Moscow overnight lost control of nearly 5,000 kilometres of former Soviet borders in Central Asia and the Caucasus. At the same time, nearly 8,000 km of what used to be internal nominal boundaries between ex-Soviet republics became Russia’s new state borders.

In 1993, Russian border guards returned to Tajikistan in an effort to contain the flow of drugs from opium-producing Afghanistan. In 2002 alone they intercepted 6.7 tonnes of drugs, half of them heroin. However, in 2005 Tajik President Imomali Rakhmon, hoping to win financial aid from the U.S., asked the Russian border guards to leave, saying Tajikistan had recovered enough from a five-year civil war (from 1992-97) to shoulder the task. Within months of the Russian withdrawal, cross-border drug trafficking increased manifold.

Turkmenistan, another major opium route from Afghanistan, threw out Russian border guards in 1999. Since 2000, Turkmenistan has reported no drug seizures to international organisations. President Saparmurat Niyazov, who died last year, claimed his country had no drug problem. However, independent surveys indicate that up to half of Turkmenistan’s male population use drugs. In 2002, the country’s Prosecutor-General Kurbanbibi Atadzhanova was arrested for operating a drug-trafficking ring.

Seventeen years after the break-up of the Soviet Union, borders between the newly independent states are still porous and travel is visa-free. Air passengers arriving from Central Asia are routinely screened for drugs in Russian airports, but if drugs are shipped by land, there is only a remote chance that they get intercepted.

Afghanistan under the U.S.

When Russia backed the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan to crush the Taliban and Al Qaeda in the post-9/11 scenario, the last thing it expected to happen was that drug trafficking from Afghanistan would assume gargantuan proportions under the U.S. military. Since 2001, poppy fields, once banned by the Taliban, have mushroomed again. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Afghanistan produced 8,200 tonnes of opium last year, enough to make 93 per cent of the world’s heroin supply.

The U.S.-led North Atlantic Treaty Organisation [NATO] forces in the country have not only failed to eliminate the terrorist threat from the Taliban, but also presided over a spectacular rise in opium production. Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Afghanistan was on the brink of becoming a “narco state”.

Narco business has emerged as virtually the only economy of Afghanistan and is valued at some $10 billion a year. Opium trade is estimated by the U.N. to be equivalent to 53 per cent of the country’s official economy and is helping to finance the Taliban.

“Unfortunately, they [NATO] are doing nothing to reduce the narcotic threat from Afghanistan even a tiny bit,” Putin angrily remarked three years ago. He accused the coalition forces of “sitting back and watching caravans haul drugs across Afghanistan to the former Soviet Union and Europe.” As time went by, Russian suspicions regarding the U.S. role in the rise of a narco state in Afghanistan grew deeper, especially after reports from Iraq said that the cultivation of opium poppies was spreading rapidly there too.

“The Americans are working hard to keep narco business flourishing in both countries,” says Mikhail Khazin, president of the consultancy firm Niakon. “They consistently destroy the local infrastructure, pushing the local population to look for illegal means of subsistence. And the CIA [Central Intelligence Agency] provides protection to drug trafficking.”

U.S. freelance writer Dave Gibson recalled in an article published in American Chronicle in December what a U.S. foreign intelligence official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told in March 2002 of the CIA’s record of involvement with the international drug trade. The official said: “The CIA did almost the identical thing during the Vietnam War, which had catastrophic consequences – the increase in the heroin trade in the USA beginning in the 1970s is directly attributable to the CIA. The CIA has been complicit in the global drug trade for years, so I guess they just want to carry on their favourite business.”


A USAF cargo plane takes off from the U.S. airbase in Incirlik in Turkey in March 2003. (photo removed from the site...)

A Russian news channel reported that drugs from Afghanistan were hauled
by American transport aircraft to the U.S. airbases in Kyrgyzstan and Turkey.

Now Russia has joined the fray accusing the U.S. military of involvement in the heroin trafficking from Afghanistan to Europe. The Vesti channel’s report from Afghanistan said that drugs from Afghanistan were hauled by American transport aircraft to the U.S. airbases Ganci in Kyrgyzstan and Incirlik in Turkey.

The Ganci Air Force base at the Manas international airport in Kyrgyzstan was set up in late 2001 as a staging post for military operations inside Afghanistan. The Kyrgyz government threatened to close the base after neighbouring Uzbekistan shut down a similar U.S. airbase on its territory in 2005, but relented after Washington agreed to make a one-off payment of $150 million in the form of an assistance package and to pay $15 million a year for the use of the base.

One of the best-informed Russian journalists on Central Asia, Arkady Dubnov, recently quoted anonymous Afghan sources as saying that “85 per cent of all drugs produced in southern and southeastern provinces are shipped abroad by U.S. aviation.”

A well-informed source in Afghanistan’s security services told the Russian journalist that the American military acquired drugs through local Afghan officials who dealt with field commanders in charge of drug production.

Writing in the Vremya Novostei daily, Dubnov claimed that the pro-Western administration of President Hamid Karzai, including his two brothers, Kajum Karzai and Akhmed Vali Karzai, are head-to-heels involved in the narcotics trade.

The article quoted a leading U.S. expert on Afghanistan, Barnett Rubin, as telling an anti-narcotics conference in Kabul last October that “drug dealers had infiltrated Afghani state structures to the extent where they could easily paralyse the work of the government if decision to arrest one of them was ever made.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Richard Holbrooke said in January that “government officials, including some with close ties to the presidency, are protecting the drug trade and profiting from it.”

In an article carried by Washington Post, the diplomat described the $1-billion-a-year U.S. counter-narcotics effort in Afghanistan as “the single most ineffective programme in the history of American foreign policy.”

“It’s not just a waste of money. It actually strengthens the Taliban and Al Qaeda, as well as criminal elements within Afghanistan,” Holbrooke wrote in the The Washington Post in early January.

It is an open question whether the Russian charges of U.S. complicity in drug trafficking are based on hard evidence or have been prompted by Moscow’s frustration at Washington’s failure to address the opium problem in Afghanistan. But it is a fact that the U.S. and NATO have stonewalled numerous offers of cooperation from the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and the Moscow-led Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO), a defence pact of six former Soviet republics.

Nikolai Bordyuzha, CSTO Secretary-General, quoted a Pentagon general as telling him: “We are not fighting narcotics because this is not our task in Afghanistan.”

Instead of joining hands with the SCO and the CSTO in combating the narcotics threat, the CSTO chief said, the U.S. was working to set up rival security structures in the region. Washington is working to “drive a geopolitical wedge between Central Asian countries and Russia and to reorient the region towards the U.S.”, Bordyuzha said last year.

With the U.S. and NATO rebuffing their cooperation offers, Russia, China and the Central Asian states have to rely on their own forces in combating the narcotics threat from Afghanistan. The CSTO has been running a wide-ranging aid and military assistance programme for Afghanistan, which includes training Afghan anti-narcotic police.

Last year, the SCO joined in signing a cooperation protocol with the CSTO, which is aimed, above all, at curbing drug trafficking. At its summit in Bishkek, the Kyrgyzstan capital, last August, the SCO decided to set up jointly with the CSTO an “anti-narcotics belt” around Afghanistan.

CFR made/controlled by Zionist Jews

Robert A. Scalapino (Director Emeritus)

Leslie H. Gelb (President Emeritus)

Maurice R. Greenberg (Honorary Vice Chairman)

Joan E. Spero
President, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

David M. Rubenstein
Co-Founder and Managing Director, The Carlyle Group

Alberto Ibargüen
President & Chief Executive Officer, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

Henry R. Kravis
Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.

Jami Miscik
Managing Director, Global Head of Sovereign Risk, Lehman Brothers

Michael H. Moskow
Senior Fellow for the Global Economy, The Chicago Council on Global Affairs

Maurice R. Greenberg
Chairman & CEO, C.V. Starr & Co., Inc.

Stephen Friedman
Chairman, Stone Point Capital

Martin S. Feldstein
President, National Bureau of Economic Research

Kenneth M. Duberstein
Chairman and CEO, The Duberstein Group, Inc.

Madeleine K. Albright
Principal, The Albright Group LLC

Charlene Barshefsky
Senior International Partner, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Henry S. Bienen
President, Northwestern University

Robert E. Rubin
Co-Chairman; Director and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Citigroup, Inc.

Richard E. Salomon
Vice Chairman; Chairman, Mecox Ventures, Inc.

Richard N. Haass
President, Council on Foreign Relations

Peter Ackerman
Managing Director, Rockport Capital, Inc.


some great information, some lies, some disinfo.

Mixed Batch:

Zionists propose spying on Skitzos

look at the panel. who do they look like? maybe the government should spy ON THEM!

Assassination of Larry Davis

The Assassination of Larry Davis: an interview with nephew Barry Davis and POCC Chairman Fred Hampton Jr

pt. 1

by Minister of Information JR

Larry Davis, a former New York city resident with the persona of an 80's hood folkloric figure, was assassinated in Shawanga Concentration Camp in Upstate New York, reportedly on February 19th after being shanked (knifed) numerous times, while he was in captivity. Larry Davis' name is huge in the streets of Black ghettos across Amerikkka, because he was drug dealer who worked directly for the pigs, and wanted to quit, so the police sent a hit squad to kill him. When they kicked in his door, they were met with gunfire and a number of the officers who were sent to assassinate him, were seriously injured, while Larry escaped. 17 days later, he was cornered and taken captive.

I felt like this was a very important interview to bring to the community because of all of this media push behind this drug dealing government agent Frank Lucas in the recent box-office release “American Gangster” being viewed as the “kingpin” behind the heroin boom of the 60's and 70's that was coming out of the Vietnam War affected areas instead of the U.S. Government, the real masterminds behind the drug trade. Larry Davis' story is free of any government sanctioned embellishments. Larry was working for the police. He didn't want to do it any more, so they tried to kill him. He shot some of them in that particular police home invasion, and got away, and eventually was captured. After B.E.T., the makers of the television series “American Gangster” contacted Larry Davis, who was being held captive, about doing his story, he ended up dead.

To discuss this in part 1 of this series of articles, I have Barry Davis, the nephew of Larry Davis, and POCC Chairman Fred Hampton Jr to discuss the life of Larry Davis, in context to the politics of the American government and the devious role that it continues to play in the drug trade in the Black community. Read the words of Barry Davis and Chairman Fred Hampton Jr. in this exclusive Q and A.

MOI JR: Who is your uncle Larry Davis?

Barry Davis: Larry Davis is basically a person who went to war with the cops. He was a young guy caught up in the middle of a bunch of turmoil in New York city streets, took a couple of wrong turns, and tried to come out of that the best way that he could, and did it the best way that he could. And that was by defending himself, and he got it done.

MOI JR: Can you give us a more in depth history of who Larry Davis is, I understand that he was a kingpin, in the New York area, that was working directly for the police at one point?

Barry Davis: At one point, you know? I wouldn't say that he was a kingpin, I would say that he was more of a pawn, and the real kingpins were the police that he was working for.

MOI JR: No doubt. Can you talk about a little bit about his relationship with the police and how it went sour?

Barry Davis: Be it that I was kind of young during the time, from my perspective of what was going on be it that I was there, was that he was a soldier working for them, and decided, because you gotta understand his fam and background because he comes from a real baptist background, everybody goes to church on Sunday, and his mother and father they were there. Being from that background, he knew what he was doing, and when he tried to come up out of that, they wouldn't let him, because he was making so much money for them. And the way he did it, they just couldn't allow for it to go down like that. He had to do what he had to do.

MOI JR: What year did he catch his case, and could you tell the people a little bit about his case?

Barry Davis: Around the time, '86, that's when he did what he had to do with these police officers, but when he had his run, it was prior to that, you're talking about maybe '82-'86. From then, he was just running around doing what the police had him doing; drugs, strongarm or whatever. Whatever they needed for him to do, that's what he was doing for them.

MOI JR: Was he reportin' directly to the police in uniform, or was he reporting to pigs that were undercover?

Barry Davis: Yes, more or less, they were plain clothes police; detectives that we called Sullivan and Crazy Joe. Those were the guys that he was working for.

MOI JR: What was he charged with?

Barry Davis: He was convicted of some alleged murder of some drug dealer. But the actual shooting of the cops, he beat that hands down. You know, he never was convicted of shooting those cops. He won that. That particular trial he won, but they got him on some underhanded, lowdown, out of the public eye conviction on some drug dealer in the Bronx. And that's what they convicted him on. He got that life sentence on that.

MOI JR: When did the family hear that Larry Davis was assassinated?

Barry Davis: It's still kind of hard to believe, because it is so fresh going through my head. It has been kind of speedy the last couple of days, but I'm gonna do my best with that one. We got the word Tuesday night that something had happened to him, and Wednesday morning was the conformation that he was killed in Shawanga. You know that there is an ongoing investigation as we speak, so as from what I'm understanding now is that we might have been two days late on the information, with them actually contacting us, that anything that happened to him.

MOI JR: Do we have any details around the assassination?

Barry Davis: Not at this particular time, you know its real sketchy, and we won't know anything until further inquiry on what's going on.

MOI JR: Many of us believe that there is a bigger plot at hand, but who is the particular assassin in this case, the one who's hand was on the weapon?

Barry Davis: Actually I don't have too much information on this guy, as far as I know his name is Luis Carsadio, but none of that is really sticking with us right now, just cause how everything went down, from what we are understanding right now. We can't really point no fingers on anything right now.

MOI JR: Chairman Fred, can you give the people a backdrop as to what was happening in the waning years of the Black Power Movement, where drugs were flooded into these neighborhoods, and could you speak about what you know about the case of Larry Davis?

Ch. Fred: First and foremost let me extend my condolences to Brotha Barry and the entire family, and even to the community because it is a lost to the entire community. The deal is that the drug economy that was pushed on the Black and other oppressed communities was and is a “illegal capitalist economy”. And I say a quote on quote illegal capitalist economy, because the fact is that every economy that this government got going; everything from the prison economy to many of the 9 to 5 jobs that go on out here, in fact we got this term that when people have a job we say “you are going to the plantation”, because this whole system is illegitimate and illegal, but in particular it was the drug-imposed economy on our people. A majority of these brothas and sistas, in fact none of them, engaged in the drug trade out of their own volition. I just want to re-iterate what brotha Barry pointed out, that by no means could Larry Davis or any other force in the community be defined as a kingpin because in reality we know who the real gangsters are; the Ronald Reagans, the Bushes, the Rockefellers, and so on and so forth. So again, the way that we must view anybody that engaged in hustling or whatever, is that it is a drug imposed economy by force one way or another or whether it be by the direct, pigs planting stuff on brothas and sistas in the community, or just limiting access to any other ways to resources or means of survival to people in the community and saying that this is your “option”. And a lot of people say that I don't believe that the government makes people sell drugs, on the contrary they do in one way or the other.

I just want to point out to that Larry Davis, and so many other forces was a victim, and Larry Davis was the average cat but again not the average cat. He was a victim who took the position that he was going to be a fighting back victim. And he is a symbolism of defiance, a symbolism that transcended the borderlines of New York, where people throughout the world felt like he, in laymen's terms, had the right to liberty and self-determination, and regardless of how many badges, or guns, or how many law books, or Constitutions, or rules that the system may run down to him, this brotha felt that he had a right to life, and he moved in defense of his life, and he took a courageous stance, and stood and still stands as a symbolism of resistance.

Hololies, Nuremburg; EXCELLENT

what a great breakdown, watch this!

Monday, February 25, 2008

False Flag prospects 2008

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out. As I'll detail below, this is exactly how government perpetrators in the US and UK handled the 9/11 and 7/7 "terror" attacks, which were in reality government attacks blamed on "terrorists."

Although ill health keeps me from working as hard in the area of false flag analysis as I used to, the urging of independent editors and brother intelligence officers has prompted me to write this essay. I'll keep it short for readers with limited time, but I will include invaluable links for those who want to delve deeper and understand better.

My aim, as a former military intelligence officer who spent five years with the U.S. Army 75th Division conducting military war games, is to convince the American people that the "next 9/11" -- constantly promised by officials and the media -- is likely to be carried out under the guise of future military exercises. If the American people are aware of pending exercises and the danger they represent, then the exercises cannot "go live" and effect the very terror events that they are supposed to be rehearsing against.

Military Exercises

The 9/11, 2001 attacks in the United States and the 7/7, 2005 attacks in the United Kingdom both have smoking guns proving that the mass murderers were not foreign terrorists but domestic tyrants. Each country's government was conducting military exercises that simulated the exact events that were to occur.

The US 9/11 Commission stumbled across strong evidence of treason by Dick Cheney when it interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who was present in Cheney's famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped toward Washington, DC. Cheney was at the center of national military exercises simulating terrorist hijackings of US aircraft -- at the very time that those hijackings were occurring in real life. On May 23, 2003, Secretary Mineta testified:

"During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"

9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton failed to follow up on the bombshell revelation, and quickly switched the topic. Thanks to YouTube, Mineta's astounding revelation and Hamilton's amazing reaction are both viewable on a three minute clip:

In the case of the 7/7 London railway bombings, there is same-day evidence in a BBC interview with former Scotland Yard anti-terrorism agent, Peter Power, who was a contract employee working in government exercises:

POWER: "At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now."

BBC HOST: "To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?"

POWER: "Precisely."

For a one minute excerpt containing the statements above, refer to

Mainstream Media

It goes without saying that serious media inquiry would quickly ferret out the facts demonstrating high treason in the cases of 9/11 and 7/7. It also goes without saying, unfortunately, that the traitors behind the two false flag attacks understood this very well, and would not have done what they did without a green light from a collaborative media.

Three World Trade Center buildings collapsed in New York City on September 11, 2001: WTC 1 and WTC 2 (the Twin Towers) in the morning, and WTC 7 (the Salomon Building) at 5:20 p.m. EST. Given that all three buildings were said to be unexpected collapses by all official sources, there is no good reason -- except for complicity -- to explain how it is that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty minutes before it happened:

Fox news damned itself by announcing that WTC 7 had collapsed -- even as it showed a live shot of downtown New York with WTC 7 still standing. A few seconds later the building collapsed, understandably confusing the newscasters:

The owner of all three buildings was Larry Silverstein, who had recently doubled the insurance value of the Twin Towers. Amazingly, "Lucky Larry," later stated in a PBS interview that he and the New York Fire Department agreed to a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Since skyscrapers are not wired for demolition -- unless someone intends to demolish them -- Silverstein's statement is an admission that 9/11 was an inside job:

"The Noble Lie"

I believe that on the strength of the five YouTube links above an objective investigation would have more than enough evidence to warrant impeachment of Bush and Cheney on a charge of high treason, and to summon a grand jury that would indict many others on charges of high treason against Larry Silverstein and other apparent 9/11 collaborators. I believe that the American people, if presented with a single news story containing the five YouTube links above, would demand that the case of high treason be carried to its logical conclusion.

Congress, though, won't impeach the president. The mainstream media, for which I used to write, will not investigate and report the story. The military that was used as a tool to mass murder American citizens will not take action against traitors in uniform who knew exactly what they were doing on 9/11, or the many more uniformed dupes who thought they were conducting military exercises until the events of 9/11 occurred. To this day there have been no adverse actions -- which would require investigation and evaluation -- against any military person involved in what even official apologists call the greatest defense failure in American history. All of this shows that the fix is in, and that we are in a fix.

The high officials, media executives and military officers who are bound by law and ethics to serve the American people have become a textbook example of a grand conspiracy. To look at it from their point of view, they are historic actors who are beyond good and evil, who must stimulate the American people to a necessary geostrategic adventure by any means necessary. To them, the official account of the 9/11 "terror" attacks is what Plato once described as the "noble lie," a necessary falsehood told to a childlike public in order to direct it maturely. The simple fact is that 9/11 has justified an attempt to seize and control the ultimate geostrategic resource: oil. He who controls Middle East oil controls the world.

Top Three US Target Cities

Last year I published "Next 9/11, Summer 2007?" in response to the same kind of requests that have led me to publish this essay as a 2008 update. My 2007 three most likely cities for the next 9/11 were Houston, Chicago and Portland. This year the same three cities are still most endangered, in light of the fact that the US military has designated Texas, Indiana and Oregon as three of its four target states in the 2008 version of its Noble Resolve military exercises. Granted, Chicago is in Illinois, not Indiana, but Indiana is quite close, and has been used to stage forces for terror exercises conducted in Chicago in recent years.

It may come as a surprise to people not acquainted with military preparations that the same cities remain on the list even though analysts like me have publicized them widely. There are considerable difficulties in setting up the political, police, military and media players necessary to support a false flag attack. While many in the 911 truth movement believes that national military forces can simply hit any city at any time, it's not so easy -- thank God. Fortunately, this means that those of us who study false flag prospects and focus on most likely targets; regrettably, this means that target cities can't breathe easy just because they have detected, exposed and preempted a single false flag attempt.

Here is a brief target analysis of the top three cities:

Primary Target: Houston. Over the past four years military and police veterans like me have been alerting the public to government exercises aiming at the nuclear destruction of Houston petro-suburbs. Five times in those four years we were able to predict to within a day major petrochemical explosions in those petro-suburbs. The odds against this kind of accuracy are astronomical. As the center of Big Oil and the Bush Family, Houston remains the most endangered city in America. Any patriotic group, like mine, trying to alert its home city to the dangers of a false flag attack should read my recent article, "The 1/31 Nuke: Proof for Ron Paul" about the successful interdiction of a 2006 attempt against Texas City:

Secondary Target: Chicago. While Houston is the most endangered city, the most endangered building -- the best candidate to be the next World Trade Center -- is the Sears Tower. Official sources have pronounced it just that ever since the original 9/11 attack, when they said it was on the Al Qaeda hit list. Larry Silverstein, who bought the Twin Towers two months before 9/11, led a group that purchased the Sears Tower on 3/11, 2004, the day of the Madrid bombings. Federal officials have been pointing to Chicago and its Sears Tower as Al Qaeda targets since the original 9/11 attacks, and have repeated the threat ever since. In May 2006,, the government scheduled secret 9/11-type exercises in Chicago, while Chicago Mayor Daley was docked conveniently away in Israel for his first visit there. I sent a widely read communiqué to Illinois Governor Blagojevich as part of a successful Internet attempt to shut down the pending false flag attack:

Tertiary Target: Portland. Portland, called "Little Beirut" by Bush cronies because of its enmity to Bush 41 and Bush 43, only made my top three list last summer, when it was designated as a target for a nuclear attack by successive exercises Noble Resolve and TOPOFF. The language in an official press release stated the case plainly enough: "Noble Resolve will coordinate with officials in Oregon to model a nuclear attack on Portland." In the course of researching Portland for a series of articles I wrote about the city and its exercises. I discovered that Stanford and Harvard had prepared a detailed nuclear fallout map for it, that national military commanders and state National Guard commanders were telling different stories about what the exercises were trying to accomplish, and that Portland's The Oregonian newspaper was doing everything it could to avoid investigating the frightening anomalies. I wasn't at all surprised that the last day of the exercises found the Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff in downtown Portland, which was largely closed down by an "unexpected" bomb threat. For another professional perspective on how great the danger was -- and may be again -- I refer the reader to the analysis of my colleague, Major William B. Fox (USMC):


"Good morning. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison." -- George W. Bush, Feb. 13, 2008

I can't think of a more important question than the one of where the next 9/11 will be attempted. Common sense dictates to all of us who understand the truth about 9/11 that its perpetrators must strike again. Indeed, every directive, act and decision of our post-9/11 unitary executive, cowards Congress and Judas judiciary has increased the power of the federal government to wage the Global War and impose the Homeland State.

Why on earth would those already guilty of high treason, mass murder and war crimes fail to follow up on their earlier efforts? They understand quite well that the Global War is going badly and the Homeland State is becoming onerous, and that only a reapplication of false flag terror will force the American people to proceed with our post-9/11 national insanity.

Still, for every one person who republishes or constructively comments on this essay, there will be another who employs division, abuse and ridicule against me or anyone else who asserts the common sense point that false flaggers will continue to false flag, just as murderers will continue to murder and robbers will continue to rob. It's Newtonian in its simplicity: things continue to drift the way they are drifting until they are stopped.

We can only stop the deadly drift of America by understanding 9/11 and anticipating the next 9/11. Many of the vociferous voices impeding our understanding and anticipation are performing a vital service for treason. The federal government once used counterintelligence programs (COINTELPRO) against the Vietnam era antiwar and civil rights movement, and common sense would suggest that they are using it again in the post-9/11 era, this time against the antiwar and 911 truth movement. The most dangerous voices of all our those from false friends who have infiltrated us to confuse us until the traitors who carried out 9/11 can repeat their performance.

Captain May is a former Army military intelligence and public affairs officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer. His political and military analyses have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Houston Chronicle and Military Intelligence Magazine.

For more information, or his interview schedule, refer to his homesite:

Economic thought patterns

From: Skilluminati

The title is pretty self-explanatory, eh? This is a collection of the very best, most concise articles I've found. Considering that media power -- which is thought control, after all -- has been decentralized and that billions of dollars are flying in all directions, I find it hard to believe that anyone wouldn't be interested in this material. Don't be depressed, don't be confused. You live in a time of rare opportunity and there is a lot of work to be done. Feel free to jump in at any time.

The Long Tail
-- How digital storage and niche marketing are changing the rules of What Makes Money. An essential concept.

New Rules for the New Economy -- Kevin Kelly, author of Out of Control, drops his 12 key insights about where your world is headed. He is a visionary with an outstanding track record, and well worth listening to.

Economics, Computers and the War Machine -- Manuel DeLanda is dense reading but well worth it. He sees connections like a technician, thinks like an acidhead, and writes like a philosopher. Very important perspective.

Nader on the Israeli Siege

"Religion controls your mind!"

This is how I responded to a person talking about the importance of a "personal search" for the Divine as opposed to believing in the strict confines of "religion", on a forum in a thread about spirituality and religion. Some might benefit by it.

People who worship humans hide that worship from themselves as well.

Usually, they cloak it in pseudo-philosophical terminology to justify it.

If one doesn't worship a god or gods, one substitutes tangible things or humans in its place. Some indulge in self-worship, others worship another man or woman or idea; it's always there and the individual rushes to defend it.

I appreciate the apparently genuine attempts to "free" me from my "bondage" to a "religion" but it's always been hilarious to me.

Everyone has a personal search but because people are fatefully lazy, they'll create cognitive shortcuts and rely on pattern recognition to label and compartmentalize ideas and people.

Thus because the bible has contradictions all religion is false.

I KHANSTANTLY question my religion. EVERY SINGLE DAY. Anyone who advances spiritually does so because humans were endowed with intelligence and free will so we don't want to be "had" at another's expense, following difficult orders and suffering the loss of sensory pleasures advocated by the irreligious/unspiritual.

However, EVERY TIME, my questions have been answered simply, holistically and beautifully. As I understand Islam and can prove with scriptural evidence, I'm supposed to question and contemplate existence.

For instance, polygamy. Most westerners will point to this as an unfair and oppressive practice but Islam allows it with many pre-conditions. In addition it's known that arabs had tens and sometimes hundreds of wives and harems so, in that sense, it wasn't an allowance but rather a RESTRICTION, to 4 MAX. Then if you can't treat them all FAIRLY, equitably, and justly, YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED to have more than one. If you can't provide for all of them, you're not allowed.

But people will question the existence of such an institution, like WHY?

And why are men allowed but not women?

History and biology answers these clearly. Consider the difference in temperament. Is it logical to assume 4 men could live harmoniously with one woman? Pre-20th century how do you determine the father?

2ndly, wars usually deplete the male population far more than women and children. What do the widow mothers do? Ruin the lives of happily married couples by seducing the men? Will those men who have trysts with those widows take care of the widows children? the children they end up having?

Adorable attempts to create a conflict between a personal search for the Divine and a religion are diaphanous in their hollow emptiness. That's not to say a personal search should always result in adopting a religious tradition, but that such a result is neither rare, nor wrong, nor antithetical to the search.

And personally, I have a KHANSTANT reinforcement of Divine Signs which fortifies my faith from all attacks.

much more detail on some of these signs is here:

1907 - Prophecy is fulfilled; Alexander Dowie after having 10's of THOUSANDS of followers is abandoned by ALL including his own family after becoming paralyzed on stage in NYC after he entered into the Prayer Duel with the Messiah, Ahmad (as)

1905 - another prophecy fulfilled when a terrible plague overtakes Afghanistan after 2 new followers of the Messiah are heinously stoned to death for apostasy. the followers of the messiah are saved. afghanistan is predicted to see only violence and bloodshed for a long time.

1904 - a plague occurs in India as prophecized by the Messiah. his followers are saved, even one who is inflicted after the sickness advances to a terminal stage.

1897 - as per very specific prophecy to the day Pundit Lekh Rahm is fatally stabbed. His house was surrounded by armed guards and police because of the prophecy yet no one saw the assailant enter or leave the house

more here about other subjects as well:

1917 - the prophecy about the end of the Czar made in 1905 is fulfilled when the Judeo-Bolsheviks slaughter his family in the "Russian Revolution"

1988 - the 4th Khalifa after the Messiah tells Pakistani president Zia Ul Haq to stop persecution of ahmadis in pakistan. He repeatedly tells him that a punishment is waiting for him. Despite this Zia continues persecution even trying to pass a law that ahmadis have to wear a collar.

August 13, 1988 - The Khalifa tells him that his time is up and God will pulverize him and his body will leave no remains.

August 18, 1988 - Zia ul Haq's plane explodes in midair, with CIA ABOARD. to this day no investigation has resulted in any clarity about what happened. All they found was a fake tooth of his, which is now buried in "his" grave. (look for zia ul haq)

October 7th 2005 - 8 ahmadis are gunned down in a small town in pakistan and many more are injured during [b]FAJR PRAYER on the 2nd day of RAMADAN.[/b]

October 8th 2005 - The VERY NEXT day, A GIANT earthquake overtakes Pakistan, followed by aftershocks AND HAILSTORMS, killing over 80,000 people. No one from our community (ahmadi) dies in the attack. No ahmadi home collapses; in many instances non-ahmadi homes collapse all around a standing ahmadi home.


I see them as signs of God. The only response of "intelligent" humans is, "well, why would God kill innocent people"

all humans will die. If a painter makes a masterpiece doesn't he have the right to destroy it?

Should I abandon this blatant Truth from Allah in favor of ignorant and arrogant man's unintelligent maxims about being "free" from the "chains" of "organized religion" and "thinking for yourself"


Please. That's clownishry.

You're welcome to khandescend to those "sheep" and "religious nutjobs" who don't "question their beliefs."

But most of them probably laugh right back. I know I do.

Sometimes a toss in a prayer.

Iovine on the new music industry paradigms

via Artists House

Spoken WORD